U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings
  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection

Logo of phenaturepg

Global Trends of Acidity in Rainfall and Its Impact on Plants and Soil

Jigyasa prakash.

Laboratory of Air Pollution and Global Climate Change, Department of Botany, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India

Shashi Bhushan Agrawal

Madhoolika agrawal.

Due to its deleterious and large-scale effects on the ecosystem and long-range transboundary nature, acid rain has attracted the attention of scientists and policymakers. Acid rain (AR) is a prominent environmental issue that has emerged in the last hundred years. AR refers to any form of precipitation leading to a reduction in pH to less than 5.6. The prime reasons for AR formation encompass the occurrence of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen oxides (NO x ), ozone (O 3 ), and organic acids in air produced by natural as well as anthropogenic activities. India, the top SO 2 emitter, also shows a continuous increase in NO 2 level responsible for AR formation. The plants being immobile unavoidably get exposed to AR which impacts the natural surrounding negatively. Plants get affected directly by AR due to reductions in growth, productivity, and yield by damaging photosynthetic mechanisms and reproductive organs or indirectly by affecting underground components such as soil and root system. Genes that play important role in plant defense under abiotic stress gets also modulated in response to acid rain. AR induces soil acidification, and disturbs the balance of carbon and nitrogen metabolism, litter properties, and microbial and enzymatic activities. This article overviews the factors contributing to AR, and outlines the past and present trends of rainwater pH across the world, and its effects on plants and soil systems.

Introduction

A worldwide increase in globalization and urbanization had augmented the consumption of energy from various sources. The use of fossil fuels mainly coal for the generation of electricity, oil in transport services, and the impact of industrialization has caused a higher degree of concentration of pollutants and particulate matter in the atmosphere, thus enhancing air pollution (Singh and Agrawal 2005 ). Greater access to energy improves both the economic growth and human development of a country, but this increase in energy demand also causes several environmental problems (Liu et al. 2019 ). Although the growth in renewables has been seen in all forms of energy since 2010, the proportion of fossil fuels in global primary energy demand remains above 80% (World Energy Outlook 2019 ). Table ​ Table1 1 shows the scenario of world primary energy demand (past, present, and estimated) by regions from 2000 to 2040. In India, energy demand outpaced global energy growth and oil demand grew by 5% in 2018 (Global Energy and CO 2 Status Report 2019 ). Fossil fuel consumption in India has increased from 208 million tons per year in 2000 to 708 million tons in 2017 (World Energy Outlook 2019 ).

Regional scenario of total primary energy demand by in the world

Values are in MTOE (million or mega tones in oil equivalent), modified from World Energy Outlook 2019

Acid rain (AR) can be defined as a combination of dry and wet deposition from the atmosphere having higher than normal concentrations of nitric (HNO 3 ), sulfuric acids (H 2 SO 4 ), and acidifying compounds which lead to a decrease in the pH of rainwater to less than 5.61. In 1845, AR was first been mentioned by Ducros, although a detailed study of AR was conducted by Robert Angus Smith ( 1872 ) and potentially harmful effects were described. There are various sources and precursors of AR formation that result both from natural and man-made activities. Natural sources are volcanic eruption, decay of vegetation, lightening, and other biogenic activities, while human-induced sources include the burning of coal, natural gas, oil in thermal power plants, and agricultural emissions resulting from the use of fertilizers, pesticides, intensive farming of paddy, and stubble burning (Zhang et al. 2007 ).

AR had arisen as one of the major environmental disasters in countries such as North America, Europe, and East Asia (Singh and Agrawal 2007 ). China suffered from a high frequency of events of acid deposition (Zhou et al. 2019 ). India is the second known emitter of SO 2 , and emissions of both SO 2 and NO x , the major sources of AR, are expected to grow at least until 2030 (Li et al. 2017 ; Andrade et al. 2020 ). The events for the occurrence of acid rain (pH < 5.6) across India showed an increasing trend over the past four decades (Bhaskar and Rao 2017 ). Moreover, emissions from agricultural activities due to excessive use of fertilizers and pesticides add ammonia (NH 3 ) and reactive nitrogen (N r ) species to the atmosphere, which further enhances the acidity of depositions (Sutton et al. 2017 ).

Worldwide occurrence of AR could negatively affect ecosystem components causing forest declines (Zheng et al. 2019 ) and loss of biodiversity, altering litter properties and enhancing soil acidification (Fei et al. 2020 ), leading to declining in soil microbial communities (Wei et al. 2020 ). One of the essential components of terrestrial ecosystems, plant productivity, is also negatively affected by AR pollution (Liu et al. 2018a , b ), leading to loss of leaves, inhibition of growth, premature defoliation or premature aging, necrotic spots, and other visible symptoms (Bobbink et al. 2010 ; Du et al. 2017 ). The aboveground parts get directly affected by AR, thus inhibiting the functions of wax biosynthesis, accumulation of intracellular H + ions, and other harmful ions in mesophyll cells (Shu et al. 2019 ). The excessive accumulation of intracellular H + ions can induce oxidative stress due to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Neves et al. 2009 ). Acidification of water bodies makes the environment uninhabitable for plants and local animals and thus causes risks to their survival (Singh and Agrawal 2007 ).

Due to lots of repercussions on the ecosystem, controlling the emissions of acidic depositary compounds in the atmosphere can be one of the best solutions that can be prioritized. Several steps were employed globally to decrease the emissions of SO 2 and NO x like the use of cleaning technologies and equipment such as efficient boilers, oxy furnaces, and fluidized combustion beds (FBC or circulation dry scrubber) in power plants and industries to control pollution, reducing the sulfur content of the fuel by using scrubbers such as lime injection multi-stage burning (LIMB) and flue gas desulfurization (FGS) (Ahmadi 2020 ). The use of selective catalytic reduction process (SCR), electrochemical reduction, selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR), and wet scrubber to reduce NOx emission (Gholami et al. 2020 ) were other control measures adopted to reduce acidic components in the emission. The expansion of renewable energy capacities (sources), such as hydroelectric projects, solar cells, nuclear power, windmills, and biofuels, for the production of electricity was enhanced instead of dependency on coal (Mohajan 2018 ). In India, vehicular emission is one of the prime contributors leading to the worsening of the air quality of cities (WHO 2018 ). Steps taken to tackle the emissions are switching to low sulfur fuel (10 ppm) and implementing Bharat VI standards for engines; the introduction of a National Automobile Scrappage Policy ( 2021 ) which ensures fleet modernization; increasing the distribution of electric and hybrid vehicles; and use of anti-smog guns and smog towers which helps to reduce pollution in the atmosphere.

This review focuses on the prevailing trend of decrease in pH of rainwater in the world and India as compared to earlier decades ago and the effects of AR on plant growth characteristics, its physiology, biochemistry, gene regulation, and soil system.

Methodology

For the literature survey, 180 papers were selected for relevant information by browsing the World Wide Web, PubMed, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate. For finding related papers, keywords such as acid rain, acidic deposition, simulated acid rain, emission from agriculture, effects of acid rain on plants, acid rain and reproductive organs, fertilizers, and acidic soil, were used. Finally, 150 articles published from August 1980 to October 2021 were considered. Data from Global Energy and CO 2 Status Report, Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), World Energy Outlook, etc. were also used.

Acid Rain Formation

Uncontrolled emissions of SO 2 and NO x from various sources are the main constituents leading to AR. The emitted pollutants dissolve in atmospheric water vapor and turn into acids like H 2 SO 4 and HNO 3 . The interaction of SO 2 , NO x , and O 3 in the atmosphere leads to many chemical reactions which finally form H 2 SO 4 and HNO 3 mists (Calvert et al. 1985 ). Figure  1 depicts the schematic representation of the pathway of AR formation and consequent effects.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 42729_2022_1051_Fig1_HTML.jpg

Schematic representation of the pathway of acid rain formation and consequent effects

Poor quality coal contains 0.5% of sulfur (S) with 35–40% of ash, which gets emitted into the environment after getting burned in thermal power plants. This converts S into SO 2 . Furthermore, it gets gradually oxidized into sulfite ion (SO 3 2− ).

However, SO 3 2− gets oxidized into SO 4 2− in the atmosphere due to the presence of NH 3 and O 3 , which finally get converted to H 2 SO 4 in clouds.

A recent study by Mallick et al. ( 2021 ) suggested a process that can increase SO 2 concentrations in the atmosphere where HOSO * can act as a source of S. The HOSO * is generated as an intermediate in the combustion condition from the oxidation of S and was found to be quite stable in the atmospheric condition. The new reaction path of HOSO * with NH 2 * has been identified which caused the in situ generation of SO 2 in the atmosphere.

Nitrogen (N) released from vehicular exhaust undergoes oxidation which after gradual oxidation turns into NO 2 . Photochemical conversion takes place which leads to the formation of different forms of oxides of N that ultimately result in the formation of HNO 3 .

The formation of AR involving O 3 is the most common reaction in the atmosphere. Photolysis of O 3 into nascent oxygen occurs which then reacts with H 2 O and forms OH − which then reacts with SO 2 and gets transformed into HSO 3 − .

Ozone plays an important role as an oxidant up to pH 5.0. In the liquid phase, H 2 O 2 is considered the most dominant oxidant for the conversion of dissolved SO 2 to H 2 SO 4 at pH range from 2 to 5 in the atmosphere, which is the main contributor for the acidification of cloudwater, fog, and rainwater (Gonçalves et al. 2010 ).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 42729_2022_1051_Figa_HTML.jpg

The Trend of Acid Rain Scenario

Countries like North America, Europe, and China are facing a huge number of problems due to acid rain in particular (Abbasi et al. 2013 ). The first evidence of AR was observed in the mid-nineteenth century. In 1972, United Nations held a conference in Sweden on the subject of the human environment which concluded that AR is a serious international pollution problem (Kowalok 1993 ). The pH of AR in Europe was reported to increase by 10% over the last 20 years. Presently, the acidity of rainwater in the countries of Europe such as Canada, Denmark, and Germany was observed to be between 4.2 and 4.5 whereas it was 4.8 in the USA (Abbasi et al. 2013 ). In 2018, the pH of Poland’s rainwater lies between 3.64 and 7.36 with mean values ranging between 4.52 and 6.58 (Diatta et al. 2021 ). According to Piñeiro et al. ( 2014 ), the pH of rainwater in Coruña (Spain) is found to be 5.55. The pH values of precipitation of several European countries including Austria, Belarus, Croatia, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Switzerland, and the UK were reported by Keresztesi et al. ( 2019 ) to be between 4.19 and 5.82 with a mean of 4.80. The higher concentration of acidic anions (SO 4 2− , Cl − , NO 3 − ) compared to neutralizing cations (Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , NH 4 + ) can be considered a reason for the lower values of pH as reported.

As per US EPA ( 2013 ), the USA and Canada have decreased the near boundary activities of releases due to the implementation of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule and litigation (CSAPR 2011) which reduced the sulfur and nitrogen deposition. This report further stated that the major decrease in the SO 2 and NO x emissions and deposition of acid is due to the implementation of programs such as the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), Acid Rain Program (ARP), and NO x Budget training Program (NBP). It was also mentioned that the present emission levels were still not acceptable, and complete recovery of acid-sensitive ecosystems is not possible in near future (Ahmadi 2020 ).

Andrade et al. ( 2020 ) identified AR as a rising issue in several major cities of Brazil such as São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro where low pH values of 3.5 and 4.0 were reported. Akpo et al. ( 2015 ) reported a pH of 5.19 in Djougou, West Africa. At present, SO 2 emissions in the western parts of the world are decreasing and the ecosystem of these regions is improving (Shah et al. 2000 ), whereas the situation in the eastern parts of the world, especially in the regions of south-central Asia, has continuously deteriorated over the years due to the growing size of the industrial sector and population boom. AR has affected around two million square kilometers in China and this area is also continuously expanding. Also, in around 44 cities in China, the pH values of rainwater lie between 3.8 and 4.5 while the mean value was around 5.6 (Sun et al. 2016 ). According to Watanabe and Honoki ( 2013 ), the mean rainwater pH was found to be 4.7–5.3 in the Mt. Tateyama region near the Japan Sea. The presence of CaCO 3 in dust particles leads to the neutralization of acidic species of rainwater. The Japan Environment Agency reported an average pH of 5.2 in the 1970s and below 4.7 in 2000 at Ryori on the Pacific coast which showed a fivefold increase in acidity (Shah et al. 2000 ). Table ​ Table2 2 shows the variations in the values of pH of various regions of the globe from 1980 to 2016.

Comparison of rainwater pH values in different regions of the world

In 2018, a World Health Organization (WHO) report has stated that many Indian cities including Kanpur, Faridabad, Gaya, Varanasi, and Patna are some of the most polluted cities around the globe in terms of air pollution. Studies on rainwater in India showed a range of pH from alkaline to acidic (Table ​ (Table3). 3 ). Metropolitan cities such as Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, and Chennai, as well as cities located close to industrial areas, show evidence of AR. According to data from CPCB, there was a significant 2–threefold increase in NO 2 level as compared to SO 2 from 2004 to 2020 (Table ​ (Table4) 4 ) which has led to a rise in the frequency of AR. In India, AR is often ruled out due to the abundance of alkaline particles (Ca 2+ , NH 4 + , and Mg 2+ ) in the atmosphere, but with increasing emissions from vehicles and industries, the contribution of acidic components has increased in rainwater (Bisht et al. 2015 ; Rao et al. 2016 ).

Range of rainwater pH in different parts of India

Average concentrations of SO 2 and NO 2 at different cities of India

Source: CPCB; BDL , below detection level; NA , data not available

Events of AR in India have increased since the last decade. During 1970–1990, in India, the regions with lower pH values of rainwater have been increasing gradually but AR has still not been considered a threat in the country (Sridharan and Saksena 1990). Datar et al. ( 1996 ) assessed the annual precipitation volume-weighted means of monthly collected rainwater samples from 10 Background Air Pollution Monitoring Network (BAPMoN) stations between 1973 and 1990. The study revealed that the pH of rainwater is decreasing in almost all stations but reductions in mean values were not significant (Datar et al. 1996 ) (Table ​ (Table5). 5 ). Based on sensitivity calculations done by using the RAIN-ASIA model, it was also predicted that the southeast coastal regions are considered most susceptible to AR (Foell et al. 1995 ). According to Bhaskar and Rao ( 2017 ), Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) stations reported that the mean pH of rainwater was highest and lowest at Jodhpur and Mohanbari while the values vary from 5.25 to 6.91. During 1981–2012, all stations recorded a decrease in the mean pH of the precipitation. It was also observed that the probability of rainfall with low pH has decreased in Srinagar during 2001–2012 but in all other stations, acidic rainfall percentage has increased from 1981–1990 to 2001–2012 (Table ​ (Table5). 5 ). A rainfall of pH 3.67 has been reported from Allahabad. The mean pH value of rainwater was 5.32 during 2003–2005 at Dhanbad, the coal city of India. Singh et al. ( 2007 ) stated that this part of the country has been dealing with large quantities of suspended particulate matter due to various activities such as mining, untreated outlets from the industrial sector, loading and unloading of coal, and vehicular emissions. At Mahabaleshwar, a hill station located in Peninsular India, a study assessed that there was a significant concentration of SO 4 2− and NO 3 − ions in the samples taken during the summer monsoon between 2016 and 2017, and about 23% of the rainfall occurrences were acidic in nature (Waghmare et al. 2021).

Range of rainwater pH in different parts of India measured at BAPMoN station (modified from Datar et al. 1996 ) and GAW station (modified from Bhaskar and Rao 2017 )

Apart from inorganic acids (H 2 SO 4 , HNO 3 , HCl), organic acids (weak acids) can cause the acidity of rainwater. Organic acids (OCs) are a pervasive component of the troposphere and present in gaseous form in the atmosphere (Sun et al. 2016 ). Acetic (CH 3 COOH) and formic acids (HCOOH), as well as dicarboxylic acids such as oxalic acids (C 2 H 2 O 4 ), are most abundant in the atmosphere (Avery et al. 1991 ; Legrand et al. 2005 ). Yearly, in the extratropical northern hemisphere, carboxylic acid accounts for < 25% of rainwater H + , 50% in the southern tropical continents, and around 25 to 50% in the southern hemisphere, causing the rainwater pH below 4.5 (Shah et al. 2000 , 2020 ). It was estimated that the presence of these compounds in urban environments leads to 16 to 35% of the free acidity in rainwater and 65% in remote areas (Paulot et al. 2011 ).

Avery et al. ( 2006 ) reported different types of OCs in the rainwater of North Carolina, USA. Formic and acetic acids were the most abundant which comprised approximately 75% of total OCs. The presence of OCs is also reported in marine areas of Puerto Rico of the Caribbean Sea (Gioda et al. 2011 ). The sources of OCs can either be direct or indirect which include incomplete combustion of fuels in vehicles, biomass burning, biofuels, fossil fuel, and vegetation, or formed in the atmosphere by photochemical reactions. A study by Cruz et al. ( 2019 ) reported that on average, 89% of acidity in the Brazilian city Salvador was caused by OCs (48% of acetic acid and 41% of formic acid) in contrast to 11% by inorganic acids. A study of rainwater chemistry carried out in Spain by Peña et al. ( 2002 ) reported that formic and acetic acids are dominant carboxylic acids in rainwater and led to 90 and 89% of acidity while oxalic and citric acids were present in lower percentages. A study carried out by Sun et al. ( 2016 ) in the area of Mount Lu in south China showed a significant amount of OCs in rainwater which contributed to 17.66% acidity. Kumar et al. ( 2014 ) suggested that the presence of OCs led to an increase in the acidity of rainwater in Delhi. Khare et al. ( 1997 ) reported the presence of aldehyde (HCHO), formic, and acetic acid in rainwater was reported during the monsoon period at a rural site in Agra.

The Annual Trend of SO 2 and NO 2 Concentrations Across the World

SO 2 and NO 2 concentrations depict significant spatial variations throughout the world. Higher percentage changes were recorded from tropical and subtropical countries including India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Thailand (Table ​ (Table6). 6 ). Variations in SO 2 and NO 2 levels depend on sources and prevailing local, regional, and global meteorological conditions (Swartz et al. 2020 ). Krotkov et al. ( 2015 ) examined the long-term (2005–2015) spatial and temporal trends of SO 2 and NO 2 pollution around the globe by retrieving data from the satellite-borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) of NASA’s Aura satellite. It was reported that in many regions, pollution levels showed dramatic upward and downward trends while others showed opposite trends of SO 2 and NO 2 . The period of 2005–2015 evidenced a drastic decrease in SO 2 and NO 2 levels in the eastern USA by 80 and > 40%, respectively, as a result of stricter emission regulations and technological advancements. Similarly, as per the data of EEA (European Environment Agency 2013 ), ~ 80% reduction in SO 2 emissions was observed in Europe during 1990–2011. Between 1980 and 1990s, a remarkable reduction of SO 2 emissions was recorded in western European countries after which SO 2 levels dropped below the detection limit of the OMI, while insignificant changes have been reported for NO 2 on a regional level (Krotkov et al.  2015 , 2016 ).

Spatio-temporal variations in the annual concentration of SO 2 and NO 2 (in terms of percentage change) in different countries

ns , not significant; NA , not available

+, increase; −, decrease

Swartz et al. ( 2020 ) assessed the long-term inter-annual and seasonal trends of atmospheric O 3 , SO 2 , and NO 2 for 21 years at the Cape Point Global Atmosphere Watch (CPT GAW) station, South Africa. The analysis revealed a constant trend of NO 2 and SO 2 concentrations for long-term average (1995–2015); however, a nominal decrease was noticed in SO 2 levels between 1995 and 2004 and then a steady rise from 2005 to 2009. The annual average concentrations of NO 2 declined from 1996 to 2002 after which a consistent increment was observed with maximum concentrations in 2011 (Swartz et al. 2020 ).

Although being the world’s most severe SO 2 polluter, the North China Plain (NCP) experienced a decreasing trend of SO 2 since 2011, with about a 50% reduction from 2012 to 2015. In contrast, NO 2 peaked in 2011, after a substantial increase of ~ 50% since 2009, which further showed a reduction of 40% between 2014 and 2015 due to the stagnant economic growth (Krotkov et al.  2015 , 2016 ). Similarly, a study by Zhao et al. (2021) reveals that the annual average concentrations of SO 2 and NO 2 throughout China decreased by 67.9 and 24.9%, respectively, in 2019 as compared to 2014. On contrary, from the period 2005 to 2015, India experienced escalating levels of SO 2 and NO 2 of more than 100 and 50%, respectively, emitted from fossil-fuelled power plants and smelters (Krotkov et al. 2015 , 2016 ). However, a significant reduction in the annual mean concentration of SO 2 in 2020 (approx.7–8%) was observed as compared to 2010–2020. This change was evident due to the COVID-19 pandemic-led national lockdown and the shutdown of industries as well as the implementation of effective control technologies such as the flue gas desulfurization (FGD) and scrubber (Kuttippurath et al. 2022 ).

Irie et al. ( 2016 ) investigated the annual trend analysis of NO 2 levels in East Asia and found that in Japan, NO 2 levels decreased from 2005 to 2013 including a larger decrease that tended to occur in metropolitan areas of Tokyo and Fukuoka. However, the NO 2 level increased by ~ 13% year −1 from 2013 to 2015. As per the observation of Ito et al. ( 2021 ), a significant reduction in (~ 75%) SO 2 concentrations has been detected in Japan over 30 years (1990–2018). Jang et al. ( 2017 ) observed an increasing trend of SO 2 levels in the rural and commercial sites of Busan, South Korea, throughout the period from 2005 to 2014 due to local emissions from shipping industries, while NO 2 levels remain constant.

The Annual Trend of Rainfall pH

A comprehensive assessment of rainwater chemistry between 1978 and 2017 collected from proximal areas of the USA showed that 87.90% of samples have an acidic composition with pH values under 5.6, including 49.12% of pH values ranging between 3.04 and 5, while 34.97% and 15.91% of the pH values were between 5–5.6 and > 5.6, respectively (Keresztesi et al. 2020 ). European countries also recorded acidic to slightly acidic pH of rainwater ranging from 4.19 to 5.82 over two decades (Keresztesi et al. 2019 ). In a long-term analysis of precipitation from 2018 to 2022 at Mt. Lushan located in South China, the pH of rainwater ranged from 4.9 to 7.9, having values of 5.8 as the annual volume-weighted mean pH of 87.7% of rainwater (Li et al. 2022 ). The study also recorded an increasing trend in the annual flux of wet deposition during the entire experimental period with 3 times higher wet flux of nitrate (76.3 kg/ha/year) than the annual wet deposition flux of sulfate (21.7 kg/ha/year), indicating that acidic deposition is still a serious environmental issue in the region. Similarly, the period 2000–2018 marked a significant increase in the pH of annual mean precipitation from 4.96 in 2000 to 6.88 in 2018 across the western Pearl River Delta region, south China (Liu et al. 2021). The annual mean pH of precipitation for 20 years (1994–2013) at Fushan Experimental Forest, northeastern Taiwan, was 4.62 ± 0.62, having ~ 77% of the rainwater considered acidic with a pH of 5.0 (Chang et al. 2017 ). Itahashi et al. ( 2021 ) reported an increase in the annual mean pH of precipitation from 4.7 to 4.8 between 2000 and 2011 at the WMO-GAW station, Ryori, northeastern Japan.

Effects of Acid Rain on Plants

Growth and yield.

Acid rain causes deleterious effects on the agricultural ecosystem by retarding the growth of crops and affecting their production (Singh and Agrawal 2004 ). It has been well established that as compared to woody plants, herbaceous plants are more sensitive to direct injury by AR (Heck et al. 1986 ). As compared to monocotyledons, dicotyledons are more sensitive toward AR (Evans 1988; Knittel and Pell 1991 ). Anatomical alterations produced by AR are modification in the thickness of cuticle (Cape 1986 ), loss of trichomes in the epidermis, cellular deformation, collapse of the mesophyll cell, occlusion of stomatal cells, and the formation of scar tissue (Da Silva 2005 ). The detrimental effects of simulated acid rain (SAR) on morphology include chlorosis, necrosis, dehydration, wilting, early senescence, stunting, pathogen infection, and death (Fig.  2 ) (Milton and Abigail 2015 ). A study by Milton and Abigail ( 2015 ) investigated the impact of SAR on the morphology of okra at pH 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0 (control) from seed to maturity. It was found that plants wilted when SAR of pH 1.0 was applied. Yellow coloration and early leaf senescence were observed at pH 2.0. At pH 3.0, plants exhibited mild and marginal chlorosis while at pH 4.0 and 6.0 chlorosis, black spots and white powdery growth all over leaves due to fungal infection were found.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 42729_2022_1051_Fig2_HTML.jpg

Underground regulation of soil microbes and fungi and effects on plant growth under AR stress: a high acidity, b moderate acidity. Abbreviations—(1) downregulation of the soil microbial community structure, decrease in the abundance of soil nitrogen-fixing bacteria, and decelerating the soil nutrient mineralization; (2) increase in mycorrhizal fungi which helps in remediation of heavy metals; (3) promoting pathogen infection, changing root physiological conditions; PM, plasma membrane; Ca 2+ , calcium ion; Mg 2+ , magnesium ion; Al 3+ , aluminum ion

The deleterious effects of AR have been reported on several agricultural and horticultural crops such as broad bean (Singh et al. 1992 ), tomato (Debnath et al. 2020 ), soybean (Pham et al. 2021 ), maize (Papova et al. 2019 ), spinach, bush bean, radish (Hosono and Nouchi 1993 ), and wheat (Singh and Agrawal 1996 , 2004 ). Haruna et al. ( 2016 ) found that the SAR caused severe symptoms on leaves of papaya ( Carica papaya ), and small lesions were observed after the second spray of SAR of pH 4.5. However, after the 5th and 8th spray, broad lesions, big necrotic spots on the lamina, and marginal necrosis appeared on the leaves at pH levels 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5 respectively.

A study by Andrade et al. ( 2020 ) evaluated the effects of SAR on the leaf blade surface of Joannesia princeps , a tree species of rainforest. It was found that when the seedlings were subjected to SAR of pH 4.5 (H 2 SO 4 ) compared to pH 6.0 (control), microstructural damage was detected only in the youngest leaves, which led to wilting of epidermal cells. Structural alterations in stomatal guard cells were also recorded. Rodríguez-Sánchez et al. ( 2020 ) found that when two tree species Liquidambar styraciflua and Fraxinus uhdei were exposed to SAR of pH 2.5, 3.8, and 5.6 (control), visible leaf damage and cuticle alteration were only found at pH 2.5 in both the species.

Neufeld et al. ( 1985 ) examined the effects of foliar applications of SAR of pH 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.6 on seedlings of four deciduous tree species native of the eastern USA ( Liriodendron tulipifera , Liquidambar styraciflua , Platanus occidentalis , and Robinia pseudoacacia ). SAR-induced foliar damage was only found at pH 2.0. P. occidentalis was found to be the most sensitive and L. tulipifera was the least, whereas old leaves of both species showed more damage than young leaves. Da Silva et al. ( 2005 ) screened the response of the tropical tree species ( Gallesia integrifolia , Genipa americana , Joannesia princeps , Mimosa artemisiana , Spondias dulcis ) under SAR treatments of pH 3.0 and 6.0 (control) by evaluating foliar injury, growth, and anatomical alterations in the leaves. It was found that all species showed chlorosis, necrotic spots, and curling of leaf blade after the first application of SAR, but J. princeps was found to be the most sensitive and S. dulcis was the least for foliar injury and seedling growth. In most sensitive species, necroses showed accretion of phenolic compounds, hypertrophy, and collapsed cells (Da Silva et al. 2005 ).

A pioneering study by Evans and Lewin ( 1981 ) established a relation between rainfall acidity and plant response which predicted the overall impact of the ambient level of AR on yield or productivity. Evans et al. ( 1982 ) studied the effects of different concentrations of SAR (pH 2.7, 3.1, 4.0, and 5.7) on the yield of alfalfa ( Medicago sativa ), garden beet ( Beta vulgaris ), kidney bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), and radish ( Raphanus sativus ). It was found that there were no significant differences observed in root mass of radish, kidney bean, and alfalfa, while a significant reduction in yield of beetroot was observed at SAR of pH 2.7, 3.1, and 4.0. The SAR treatments caused reductions in plant growth and yield of corn (Banwart et al. 1988 ), coriander (Dursun et al. 2000 ), green pepper (Shripal et al. 2000 ), pinto beans (Evans and Lewin 1981 ), and soybean (Evans et al. 1981a , b ). A control field experiment using greenhouse chambers was conducted to determine the effect of SAR of sulfuric acid rain of pH 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, and 5.6 (control) on the yield of several crops such as beet, broccoli, carrot, cabbage, cucumber, radish, mustard greens, spinach, tobacco, cauliflower, potato, green pea, peanut, soybean, alfalfa, red clover, strawberry, tomato, green pepper, onion, corn, wheat, oats, barley, orchardgrass, bluegrass, ryegrass, and timothy (Lee et al. 1981 ). It was found that marketable yield production, i.e., total aboveground portion and root weight, was inhibited in the case of beet, carrot, radish, mustard greens, and broccoli while stimulated for alfalfa, green pepper, orchardgrass, tomato, strawberry, and timothy when exposed to pH 3.0–4.0. Potato yield was also inhibited at pH 3.0 while stimulated at pH 3.5 and 4.0. No significant effects on the yield of other crops were reported. Similar results found in tomato when treated by SAR treatment of pH 2.5 showed that the growth parameters including plant height, the number of leaves, shoot weight, and stem girth were reduced significantly (Debnath et al. 2020 ).

Singh and Agrawal ( 1996 ) conducted a field experiment on two cultivars of wheat ( Triticum aestivum  var. Malviya 206 and 234) to assess the effects of SAR of pH 5.6 (control), 5.0, 4.5, 4.0, and 3.0. It was found that leaf area, shoot and root lengths, total biomass, no. of grains per plant, grain weight per plant, and yield m −2 were decreased significantly at all levels of SAR as compared to control. Similar results were observed when two different cultivars of wheat (Malviya 213 and Sonalika) were applied with SAR of pH 5.6, 5.0, 4.5, 4.0, and 3.0. The reduction in yield of Malviya 213 is observed at pH 3.0 and 4.0, whereas only at pH 3.0 in Sonalika as compared to control (Singh and Agrawal 2004 ).

One of the important forages used in China, Lolium perenne , when exposed to SAR of different pH 7.0, 6.0, 5.0, 4.0, 3.5, and 3.0, showed increments in the root-shoot ratio and total biomass between pH 4.0 and 7.0 with the maximum value at pH 5.0, indicating that moderate acidity promoted the growth of leaves, while strong AR impaired the leaves and suppresses the growth of seedlings (Yin et al. 2021 ). The growth decreased below pH 5.0, with the greatest reduction occurred at pH 3.5. Several studies have also reported that the low acidity of rain improves seed germination, promotes the aboveground biomass, and increases overall biomass accumulation in the plants (Ramlall et al. 2015 ).

Pham et al. ( 2021 ) exposed soybean ( Glycine max ) plants to SAR of pH 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, and 6.0 (control). It was found that SAR of low pH decreased the germination rate, leaf area index, shoot length, and the number of main branches of the plants. The components of yield and actual yield also decreased especially in the plants treated with pH 3.0. A similar result was obtained in Manihot esculenta when subjected to SAR of pH 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0 (control) (Odiyi and Bamidele 2014 ). It was found that high acidity of SAR (pH 2.0 and 3.0) led to the significant reduction of plant height, leaf area, total biomass, relative growth rate (RGR), and the harvest index (HI) (Odiyi and Bamidele 2014 ).

SAR induced browning of leaves, with 70% leaf abscission in Vigna unguiculata when exposed to SAR of pH 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 as compared to pH 7.0 (control) (Odiyi and Eniola 2015 ). The RGR and HI were lowest compared to pH 7.0. Liang et al. ( 2015 ) reported that SAR at pH 5.5 did not affect the RGR of rice seedlings as compared to the control. However, the maximum decrease of 79 and 57% in RGR of seedlings was observed when exposed with SAR of pH 3.5 and 2.5.

AR affects the plants either by damaging the foliage leading to a reduction in canopy cover and their growth or increasing susceptibility to drought as well as diseases (Aber et al. 2001 ). Acidic deposition impacted eastern USA red spruce and sugar maple through loss of Ca from cell membrane due to direct leaching from foliage or reduction in uptake of Ca from soil or due to losses of available Ca and Mg which made the trees more susceptible to winter injury. The Black Forest in Germany and Bavaria, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Switzerland are the areas in Europe most vulnerable under AR. Similar reports of a decline in the health of pine species have been reported in Asia (Driscoll and Wang 2019 ). Asian pine species suffered negative effects due to soil acidification which results from nutrient inequality caused due to high Al and low Ca in soil (Driscoll and Wang 2019 ).

A field investigation on the seedlings of four tree species from south China ( Cunninghamia lanceolata , Fokienia hodginsii , Phoebe zhennan , and Pinus massoniana ) revealed that SAR of high acidity (pH 2.5) significantly reduced the germination of F . hodginsii and P . zhennan , while SAR of pH 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 increased the germination of P . massoniana and had no effect on the germination of C . lanceolata seeds (Gilani et al. 2021 ). The results further demonstrated that seedling germination is more resistant than seed emergence, and seed germination in conifer species is less sensitive under SAR of pH 4.5 and 5.5 as compared to broad-leaved species. As a whole, AR of pH 3.5 was found to be the threshold level, and below this value, detrimental effects on seed germination and seedling emergence were recorded (Gilani et al. 2021 ). In contrast, Lee and Weber ( 1979 ) found that SAR of pH 2.3 to 4.0 promotes seedling emergence and growth of woody tree species (Fig.  2 b).

In nature, plants are rarely exposed to anyone kind of stress. Invasion by alien plant species causes a significant effect on the ecosystem. An experiment performed by Cheng et al. ( 2021 ) using four Asteraceae alien invasive plants (AIP), i.e., Conyza canadensis , Erigeron annuus , Aster subulatus , and Bidens pilosa , on germination of Lactuca sativa revealed that SAR of high acidity (pH 4.5) increases the process of invasion and allelopathy on the germination and root length of L. sativa.

Physiological and Biochemical Performances

Plant’s various physiological and biochemical traits were found to be negatively damaged by AR (Lee et al. 1981 ). The photosynthetic pigments in plants are most sensitive to air pollutants and are also identified as an indicator of the physiological status of plants stressed by AR. As shown in Table ​ Table7, 7 , different plants responded differently to acid deposition, but there was a common response of reduction in foliar chlorophyll content of different plant species under SAR treatments. Likewise, AR hampered the photosynthetic activity; nonetheless, the effects of SAR on photosynthetic activities varied depending on the plant species, stage, pH of the acid rain, and environmental conditions (Tong and Zhang 2014 ). Copolovici et al. ( 2017 ) showed that the photosynthetic parameters including stomatal conductance and assimilation rate of Phaseolus vulgaris decreased drastically when sprayed with acidic solutions of pH 4.0 and 4.5. Assimilation rate recovered at the initial values after 2 h of treatments, while stomatal conductance increased as acidity increased. Similarly, Odiyi and Eniola ( 2015 ) reported that in Vigna unguiculata (cowpea) leaves, SAR of pH 2.0 and 3.0 leads to reduced chlorophyll content as compared to the pH 7.0 (control).

Effects of acid rain on growth and biochemical traits of plant species

The maximal photochemical quantum efficiency of Photosystem II (PSII) represented by Fv/Fm is widely used as a sensitive stress indicator of photosynthetic performance in plants. The decline in Fv/Fm in plants indicates an increase in non-photochemical quenching processes or photo-inactivation of PSII reaction centers (Liu et al 2018b ). In rice, when leaves are subjected to SAR of pH 3.5 and 2.5, it was found that Fv/Fm showed reductions but did not show any difference at pH 5.5 from control (Wen et al. 2011 ). It indicates that the extremely high acidity SAR not only affects photosynthetic components but destroys chloroplast structure (Wen et al. 2011 ).

Sun et al. ( 2016 ) studied the impact of AR on chloroplast and its ultrastructure, photosynthesis, ATP synthase activity, gene expression, intracellular H + level, and water content of rice seedlings. It was found that at pH 4.5, 4.0, or less, chloroplast structure remained unchanged but got destroyed. It was also reported that SAR of pH 4.0 or less decreased the leaf water content, inhibits the expression of chloroplast ATP sythase subunits which caused decreased activity of chloroplast ATP synthase, reduced photosynthesis, and damage the integrity of chloroplast structure, while at pH 4.5, the expression of ATP synthase subunits and activity got increased and promoted. It shows that AR influences the plant growth and development by changing the acidity of the cells which in turn affects the chloroplast ATPase transcription and net photosynthetic rate.

Foliar application of SAR of pH 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5 on green leaves of 13 deciduous species ( Acacia , Acer , Betula spp., Carpinus betulus , Castanea spp., Fagus , Juglans sp., Malus domestica , Populus , Quercus robur , Salix , Tilia europaea , Ulmus minor ) and 10 species of dicotyledonous plants ( Bellis perennis , Beta vulgaris , Brassica oleracea , Cucumis sativas , Lactuca sativa , Lycopersicon esculentum , Phaseolus spp., Petroselinum crispim , Solanum tubersum , Vitis ) resulted into leaching of Ca, Mg, Fe, and Zn from the photosynthetic organs (Diatta et al. 2021 ). Intra-species variations were found in deciduous trees and dicotyledonous plants with more pronounced leakage of alkaline elements (Ca, Mg) and Zn. It was found that 77% of deciduous species showed very low to intermediate photosynthetic recovery implying that highly AR impacted trees have lower survival whereas, and dicotyledonous plants showed 70% (high to very high) survival. Mineral nutrients particularly Ca and Mg increased plants’ resistance to AR (Diatta et al. 2021 ). Zhou et al. ( 2020 ) found that SAR of pH 2.5 and 3.5 severely damaged the root plasma membrane (PM) permeability in Masson pine ( Pinus massoniana ) seedlings, while pH 4.5 and 5.6 lowered the PM permeability, thus indicating that SAR can destroy the integrity of plant PM.

Effect of AR on Plants at the Genetic Level

A recent study by Raju et al. ( 2021 ) on Allium cepa roots revealed that SAR of sulfuric acid of pH 3.8, 4.08, and 4.4 showed adverse effects on the morphological aspects of root and altered the root cells genetically compared to pH 4.63, 5.32, and 7.0. The SAR of sulfuric acid of pH 3.8 and 4.08 led to low root growth which is accompanied by a shorter root length in comparison with pH 7.0. Table ​ Table8 8 shows the mean root length and numbers of roots grown under different pH of SAR. It was found that the SAR of sulfuric acid of lower pH values (pH 3.8) significantly decreased the number of cells in prophase, metaphase, anaphase, and telophase, thus restraining cell division which led to lower mitotic index, causing the chromosome reorganization and thus led to modification in the number or structure of chromosomes. The chromosomal aberrations such as chromosomal bridges and fragments, nuclear lesions, micronucleus, polyploidy, binucleated nucleus, vagrant chromosomes, and sticky chromosomes were also recorded.

Shows the means for length (cm), numbers of roots grown, and decline of mitotic index in different pH values of SAR (modified from Raju et al. 2021 )

A proteomic study on Arabidopsis thaliana using 2-D gel electrophoresis revealed that several genes that are involved in the light reaction of photosynthesis such as photosynthetic electron transport chain-related genes and light-harvesting complex in photosystem I (PSI)- and PSII-related gene were repressed, while genes related to cell defense were upregulated under SAR (Liu et al. 2013 ). A study on Camellia sinensis using transcriptomic analysis reported the expression of multiple genes associated with photosynthesis, N, and S, and carbohydrate metabolisms were altered under SAR treatments (Zhang et al. 2020 ). A total of six genes that are involved in light reactions are repressed which include two genes encoding the protein of the light-harvesting complex of PSII, two genes involved in the PSII subunit, and one of PSI subunit and of ferredoxin-NADP ( +) reductase (FNR). This suggests that SAR directly damages the leaves, thus disturbing the light-harvesting and electron transfer process of PSI and PSII which in turn decreases the carbon assimilation efficiency of plants (Zhang et al. 2020 ). Genes involved in metabolism pathways of starch and sucrose as well in glycolysis such as phosphoglycerate kinase gene (PGK3), pectin methylesterase genes (PMEPCRA), enolase gene (LOS2), phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase gene (EDA9), and amidophosphoribosyl transferase gene (ASE2) were downregulated under high acidic treatment of pH 2.5.

Debnath et al. ( 2020 ) analyzed the transcriptomic profile of greenhouse-grown tomato plants exposed to SAR of pH 2.5 and 5.6 (control) and found that 182 genes were upregulated, while 1046 genes were downregulated and 17,486 genes showed no differential expression. The qPCR results used 15 genes to confirm the consistency and reliability of the profile, and among these genes, 11 genes which are related to plant secondary metabolites and 4 genes related to stress-responsive including bZIP, ERF, MYB, and WRKY family protein got downregulated in treated plants (Debnath et al. 2020 ).

A recent study by Yang et al. ( 2018 ) on soybean seedlings by using the next-generation sequencing platform has identified 416 genes that are related to the regulation of N, S, and photosynthesis, and carbohydrate metabolism showed alteration in expression when exposed to SAR. Moreover, different transcription factors that are related to abiotic and biotic stress such as WRKY, zinc finger proteins, MYB, and Ca signal pathway-associated genes were induced after SAR treatment (Liu et al. 2013 ).

Effects of Acid Rain on Soil

Being dynamic and complex in nature, soil can be easily affected by AR, which results in soil acidification and an increase in the exchange between H + and nutrient cations (Mg, K, and Ca) in the soil and results in leaching (Breemen et al. 1984 ). The growth of plants and soil fertility are affected indirectly by deficiency of these nutrients (Mishima et al. 2013 ). Nutrient deficiency inhibits nodulation in plants by limiting legumes’ ability to transmit signals that attract the rhizobia (Sullivan et al. 2017 ) and indirectly inhibits ectomycorrhizal fungal association with plants (Maltz et al. 2019 ), which results in reduced plant vigor and productivity (Fig.  2 ).

Ma et al. ( 2020 ) found that AR influenced the soil’s chemical properties under Chinese cabbage cultivation. It was observed that spraying of SAR of pH 3.5 reduced the soil pH by 0.21, 0.19, and 0.15 units at a depth of 0, 4, and 8 cm as compared to the pH 7.0 (control). However, no significant difference was found in soil pH between treatments at pH 4.5, 5.5, and 7.0. Similarly, Zhou et al. ( 2020 ) found that SAR caused a lowering of both rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil pH with the decrease of SAR pH in Masson pine ( Pinus massoniana ) seedlings. Wei et al. ( 2020 ) also showed that SAR of pH 5.5, 4.5, 3.5, and 2.5 reduced the soil pH by 5.1, 6.8, and 7.0% in latosols, lateritic red soils, and red soils, respectively. Soils having a high cation exchange capacity (CEC) and clay content showed more resistance to SAR at low acidity levels of pH 5.5 and 4.5. The maximum decline of soil pH has been observed in the soil having the lowest CEC and clay content under SAR of pH 2.5. Latosols are found to be more resistant to AR and lateritic red soils are the least as the lateritic red soil contains the lowest soil CEC and clay content. The CEC of soil mainly rely on various physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil such as soil pH, clay, and soil organic matter, which helps to mitigate the effects of acidity on the soil. Pedogenic acidification also affects water holding capacity, porosity, and soil structure (Yadav et al. 2020 ). Furthermore AR composition also has an immense impact on soil chemical and biological properties.

AR negatively regulates litter decomposition and soil respiration (Mo et al. 2008 ), but hardly affects soil temperature and soil moisture (Wu et al. 2016 ). It was reported that SAR of pH 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 decelerates the litter decomposition in birch, spruce, and pine (Francis 1982 ). The deposition of N is suggested to be one of the key drivers of C storage in the forest (Wei et al. 2012 ). The increase in the amount of N deposition could increase sequestration of soil C by suppressing the decomposition of litter and soil organic carbon (Frey et al. 2014 ), and can decrease soil microbial biomass C. AR increases dissolved organic carbon in soil (Fang et al. 2009 ). Wu et al. ( 2016 ) reported an increase in soil total organic carbon in topsoil (upper 10 cm) by 24.5% at SAR treatment of pH 3.0 compared to pH 4.5. Tang et al. ( 2019 ) also found that litter decomposition significantly decelerated in needle of Cunninghamia lanceolata and leaf of Cinnamomum camphora under AR treatments.

A study reported that SAR treatments of pH 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, and 6.4–6.6 (control) on C. sinensis (tea) cultivated on red soil decreased the levels of both available soil Mg and Ca, while SAR of pH 2.5 leads to increase in ratios of Al/Mg and Al/Ca, but decrease N/Al in twigs and roots (Hu et al. 2019 ). When SAR of pH 3.0 along with earthworm and mycorrhizal fungi (MF) treatments were applied on seedling of maize, significant increments in shoot biomass, nutrient uptake, an abundance of functional nitrogen-fixing bacteria, activation of soil nutrients, and promotion of transfer to the root system were found (Wang et al. 2021 ). The study also suggests that soil acid-neutralizing capacity can be improved by the use of earthworm and MF which helps them to combat the low pH levels (Fig.  2 ) (Wang et al. 2021 ).

AR has a severe effect on the activity, mobility, and environmental behavior of heavy metals (HMs) (Hernandez et al. 2003 ). AR after falling on the ground may lead to the release of HMs from soil and thus alters the soil chemical status, groundwater contamination, and function of the decomposer community (Ding et al. 2011 ). Kim et al. ( 2010 ) reported that under acidic conditions, HMs such as Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn become more soluble and mobile. Accumulation of HMs in the soil also affects its fertility by forming ion complexes with toxic metal ions such as Al 3+ , Pb 2+ , Hg 2+ , and Cd + (Ling et al. 2010 ). AR leads to an increase in levels of soluble Ni as well as Zn in soil except of Cu, Cd, or Pb as they are considered to interact with organic matter (Merino et al. 1994 ).

An increase in soil acidity also enhances the extractable aluminum (Al 3+ ) in the soil leading to Al toxicity (Hu et al. 2017 ). Mannings et al. ( 1996 ) reported that low acid treatments of pH 5.6 and 4.0 caused increased mobilization of Al and Zn in soil, while Cu, Mn, and Pb were observed only at high acid treatments of less than pH 2.5.

Li et al. ( 2015 ) found that SAR of pH 4.0 resulted in the release of HMs in the soil in decreasing order of Cd > Zn > Cu > Pb. In addition, HMs released after AR leaching was strongly associated with HM speciation and soil properties such as pH, texture, and organic matter. Ma et al. ( 2021 ) reported a significant reduction in the total concentration of Pb and Zn in soil when treated with SAR of pH 3.0, 4.0, and 5.6. The study revealed that high acidity contributes to the release of soil colloidal particles, and significantly enhanced the mobilization of Pb and Zn in soils due to the formation of organic–inorganic complexes with colloidal particles that are covered with organic matter, oxides of Fe and Al, and microbial cells in soil, which provide strong adsorption surface to these metal ions (Sen and Khilar 2006 ). Kim et al. ( 2010 ) studied the effects of SAR of pH 3.0, 4.5, and 5.6 on the transfer and phytoavailability of HMs in soil collected from a paddy field near a smelter in China. It was found that phytoavailability of HMs was strongly controlled by the pH of AR and lower pH can elevate the plant uptake of HMs, except Pb. After SAR treatments, total HM concentrations in soil were increased twice under pH 3.0 compared to pH 5.6. The concentrations of Cu and Zn were highest at pH 3.0 and lowest at pH 5.6. However, Cd was found to be highest and lowest at pH 4.5 and 5.6 respectively. In the case of Pb, decreasing acidity led to increased availability in exchangeable and carbonate forms because Pb changed to an available phase only after desorption with strong acid.

AR causes changes in the micro-environment of the soil, thus resulting in inhibition of the soil micro-organism activities and enzymes of soil nutrient cycling which in turn negatively affects the conversion efficiency of soil nutrients such as N, P, and S (Wang et al. 2018 ). Killham et al. ( 1983 ) reported that when the Sierran forest soil planted with Ponderosa pine seedlings were sprayed with SAR of pH 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.6, changes in microbial activity were most significant in surface soil. Soil respiration, dehydrogenase, and microbial activity were simulated under pH 3.0 and 4.0, while SAR of pH 2.0 shows inhibition of respiration and enzymatic activities. Soils receiving SAR of pH 3.0 showed increased arylsulfatase and decreased phosphatase activity, while urease was unaffected (Killham et al. 1983 ). Sinsabaugh et al. ( 2010 ) reported that AR affects soil hydrolase activity, while the activity of phosphatase shows an increasing trend with decreasing soil pH.

Effect on Soil due to Transition in Composition of AR

As the chemical composition of rainwater has been gradually changing, the shifting of AR from sulfuric to mixed and then nitric type has impacted soil enzymatic activity and microbial biomass differently (Li et al. 2021 ). When 2-year-old seedlings of Cunninghamia lanceolata , Cyclobalanopsis glauca , Pinus massoniana , and Phyllostachys edulis were exposed with SAR of sulfuric acid (S/N = 5), mixed acid (S/N = 1), and nitric (S/N = 0.2) acid of pH 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5, it was found that enzymatic activities decreased significantly under high- and mild-intensity AR treatments, and were lower than that under pH 7.0 (control). At lower acidity of all treatments, the soil rhizosphere enzyme activity was higher as compared to the control. The activity in P. massoniana , C. lanceolata , and P. edulis was inhibited more by nitric acid, while C. glauca was more inhibited by sulfuric acid (Li et al. 2021 ). Liu et al. ( 2020 ) also found that the activities of phosphatase, sucrase, and urease were higher under nitric acid as compared with sulfuric acid. Moreover, Liu et al. ( 2017 ) reported that increasing acidity of sulfuric acid (pH 3.5, 2.5) and nitric acid (pH 3.5, 2.5) leads to a decline in soil pH as compared to the pH 6.6 (control). However, no significant difference was observed among the same acidity of sulfuric and nitric acid.

Lv et al. ( 2014 ) found that a decrease of SO 4 2− /NO x − in the AR led to decrease of soil pH. The soil pH of the broad-leaved forest showed significant reduction only under mixed and nitric acids (S/N = 0:1), while the coniferous forest showed a decrease in soil pH in all AR types. Under nitric acid treatment, most soil enzyme activities except phosphatase were significantly lower than that in mixed acid (S/N = 5:1, 1:1, 1:5) and sulfuric acid (S/N = 1:0). The negative effects of nitric acid were more pronounced than those of sulfuric and mixed acid. The results revealed that the SO 4 2− /NO 3 − ratio in AR is an important factor that has a profound impact on litter decomposition, soil microbial biomass, and soil enzyme activities. Liu et al. ( 2021a , b ) reported that AR of different S/N ratios (sulfuric acid = 5:1, mixed acid = 1:1, and nitric acid = 1:5) did not have a significant effect on soil pH at the initial period of the experiment except for nitric acid pH 2.5. Soil enzymatic activity of urease and phosphatase was affected when subjected to AR with higher acidity. The activities of soil urease were highly intensified, and conversely, phosphatase activity decreased when exposed to nitric acid of pH 2.5.

Effects of Acid Rain on Reproductive Structures

The impact of AR is not limited to vegetative organs of the plants but also affects generative parts which include structures such as pollens and ovules. AR results in inhibition of pollen germination and pollen tube elongation and as a result affects pollination and fertilization and changes the quality and quantity of seeds (Fig.  2 ). Acidity (pH < 3.1) causes morphological alterations in pollens below pH 3.0. The pollen germination was completely stopped in apple ( Malva sylvestris ) at pH 2.9 (Munzuroglu et al. 2003 ). AR reduced the sucrose permeability in pollen (Renzoni and Veigi 1991 ). Wertheim and Craker ( 1988 ) also found a reduction in pollen germination in corn ( Zea mays ) by 25% at pH 2.6 compared to 5.6. It was shown that pollen tube length decreased in date palm and rice with an increase in acidity of rainwater (Ismail and Zohair 2013 ). Nandlal and Sachan ( 2017 ) conducted a field study to assess the effects of SAR of 7.0, 5.7, 4.5, and 3.0 on pollen germination of sunflowers which showed significant reductions of 71, 51, and 43% in pollen germination at 5.7, 4.5, and 3.0 respectively.

Microscopic studies in bean plants reported variations in the ovule’s formation, development, structure, and protein content (Majd and Chehregani 1992 ). Plants grown in pots when subjected to SAR of pH 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 4.5 showed a reduction in the size of the embryo sac (34%), poor penetration of embryo sac into nucellar tissue, increase in the volume of the vacuole in nucellar cells, accumulation of starch-like particles in the embryo sac, and overgrowth of ovule integuments leading to early blockage of micropyle canal (Majd and Chehregani 1992 ). Alterations in ovules resulted in abnormalities in seed formation and seed protein. The bean plants when exposed to an acidic solution of pH 2.0 set an average of 3 seeds as compared to 5–6 seeds in normal plants. There was no change in protein pattern and band numbers when seed storage protein was extracted and run on SDS-PAGE. Acidification of rain hampers gene regulation which may decrease protein production and cause modification of the quantity of protein bands (Chehregani and Kavianpour 2007 ).

Acid rain is one of the global-scale environmental challenges that have caused widespread negative effects on ecosystems during the last several decades. Gradual increase in emissions of major acid rain precursors (SO 2 and NO 2 ) in the atmosphere has resulted in view of tremendous economic development and industrial growth throughout the world. Acid rain, earlier identified as a problem of developed countries, has now spread in developing countries. The most economically developing countries like India, China, and Brazil are experiencing increased instances of AR frequency. Emission patterns of tropical and subtropical countries revealed the threats by AR are going to be more adverse in the near future as evidenced from decreasing trend of pH of rainwater. AR has potential short-term as well as long-term negative effects on plant integrity, forest and grassland ecosystems, and soil chemistry and biology. Acid rain affects plants’ biochemical, physiological, and cellular processes and causes alteration in gene expression. It enhances the chance of invasion of alien plant species through allelopathy. Soil physical and chemical properties and microbial community structure and functions are also negatively altered under AR influence.

Complications of acid rain have been tackled to some extent in the developed world by implementing the emission norms for the gases effectuating acid rain. To avoid such problems, robust and effective monitoring of emissions along with stringent regulation policies is required to be adopted by the developing world. Additionally, increasing NO x pollution around the globe changes the chemical composition of AR. A comprehensive assessment and prediction of the impacts of changing types of acid rain on plant growth and function, biodiversity, and soil properties are needed in view of scarce studies conducted on such aspects. Further investigations are also needed to assess the futuristic impacts of acid rain with a dynamically changing environment on different facets of plants and ecosystems in India and around the world which may give valuable insights into differential plant responses under AR stress.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Head, Department of Botany, and the Coordinators, CAS in Botany, Institute of Eminence and Interdisciplinary School of Life Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, for providing necessary facilities to carry out a systematic literature review. MA is also thankful to SERB, New Delhi for providing JC Bose Fellowship.

Author Contribution

Jigyasa Prakash: conceptulization, visualization, writing original draft. Shashi Bhushan Agrawal: visualization, writing—review and editing. Madhoolika Agrawal: writing—review and editing and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India, provided financial support in the form of CSIR-UGC JRF (file no. 09/013(0934)/2020-EMR-I).

Declarations

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Jigyasa Prakash, Email: moc.liamg@uhbhsakarpasaygij .

Shashi Bhushan Agrawal, Email: moc.liamg@65lawargabs .

Madhoolika Agrawal, Email: [email protected] .

  • Abbasi T, Poornima P, Kannadasan T, Abbasi SA. Acid rain: past, present, and future. Int J Environ Eng. 2013; 5 :229–272. doi: 10.1504/IJEE.2013.054703. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Aber J, Neilson RP, McNulty S, Lenihan JM, Bachelet D, Drapek RJ. Forest processes and global environmental change: predicting the effects of individual and multiple stressors: we review the effects of several rapidly changing environmental drivers on ecosystem function, discuss interactions among them, and summarize predicted changes in productivity, carbon storage, and water balance. J Biosci. 2001; 51 :735–751. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0735:FPAGEC]2.0.CO;2. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ahmadi GM. Acid rain, causes, effects and control strategies. Int J All Res Writings. 2020; 1 :219–225. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Akpo AB, Galy-Lacaux C, Laouali D, Delon C, Liousse C, Adon M, Darakpa C. Precipitation chemistry and wet deposition in a remote wet savanna site in West Africa: Djougou (Benin) Atmos Environ. 2015; 115 :110–123. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.064. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ambient air quality monitoring data for the year 2004 and 2020 (Manual Monitoring under National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Programme) CPCB. https://cpcb.nic.in/manual-monitoring/ and http://www.cpcbenvis.nic.in/airpollution/bulletin/del/2004/maindata2004.htm
  • Andrade GC, Castro LN, & da Silva LC (2020) Micromorphological alterations induced by simulated acid rain on the leaf surface of Joannesia princeps Vell. (Euphorbiaceae). Ecol Indic 116:106526 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106526
  • Atkins DH, Irwin JG, Tuck AF, Scriven RA, Barrett CF, Cape JN, Fowler D, Kallend AS, Martin A, Pitman JI (1983) Warren Spring Lab., Stevenage (United Kingdom): Acid deposition in the United Kingdom
  • Avery GB, Jr, Kieber RJ, Witt M, Willey JD. Rainwater monocarboxylic and dicarboxylic acid concentrations in southeastern North Carolina, USA, as a function of air-mass back-trajectory. Atmos Environ. 2006; 40 :1683–1693. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.10.058. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Avery GB, Jr, Willey JD, Wilson CA. Formic and acetic acids in coastal North Carolina rainwater. Environ Sci Technol. 1991; 25 :1875–1880. doi: 10.1021/es00023a005. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bamidele JF, Eguagie MO. Ecophysiological response of Capsicum annuum L. exposed to simulated acid rain. Niger J Biotechnol. 2015; 30 :48–52. doi: 10.4314/njb.v30i1.6. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Banwart WL, Porter PM, Ziegler EL, Hassett JJ. Growth parameter and yield component response of field corn to simulated acid rain. Environ Exp Bot. 1988; 28 :43–51. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(88)90045-7. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Behera S, Mishra PC, Ghosh S, Goswami C, Mallick B. Microscopic Observation of Acid Rain Induced Bacopa monnieri L. Microsc Res. 2019; 7 :11–25. doi: 10.4236/mr.2019.72002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bhaskar VV, Rao SP. Annual and decadal variation in chemical composition of rain water at all the ten GAW stations in India. J Atmos Chem. 2017; 74 :23–53. doi: 10.1007/s10874-016-9339-3. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bhatti N, Streets DG, Foell WK. Acid rain in Asia. Environ Manage. 1992; 16 :541–562. doi: 10.1007/BF02394130. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bisht DS, Dumka UC, Kaskaoutis DG, Pipal AS, Srivastava AK, Soni VK, Tiwari S. Carbonaceous aerosols and pollutants over Delhi urban environment: temporal evolution, source apportionment and radiative forcing. Sci Total Environ. 2015; 521 :431–445. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.083. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, Spranger T, Alkemade R, Ashmore M, De Vries W. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. Ecol Appl. 2010; 20 :30–59. doi: 10.1890/08-1140.1. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Breemen NV, Driscoll CT, Mulder J. Acidic deposition and internal proton sources in acidification of soils and waters. Nature. 1984; 307 :599–604. doi: 10.1038/307599a0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Calvert JG, Lazrus A, Kok GL, Heikes BG, Walega JG, Lind J, Cantrell CA. Chemical mechanisms of acid generation in the troposphere. Nature. 1985; 317 :27–35. doi: 10.1038/317027a0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Cape JN. Effects of air pollution on the chemistry of surface waxes of Scots pine. Wat Air Soil Poll. 1986; 31 :393–399. doi: 10.1007/BF00630856. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chandravanshi CK, Patel VK, Patel KS. Acid rain in Korba city of India. Indian J Environ Prot. 1997; 17 :658–661. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chang CT, Wang CP, Huang JC, Wang LJ, Liu CP, Lin TC. Trends of two decadal precipitation chemistry in a subtropical rainforest in East Asia. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 605 :88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.158. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Chehregani Abdolkarim, Kavianpour Farideh. Effects of Acid Rain on the Developmental Stages of Ovules and Seed Proteins in Bean Plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) American Journal of Plant Physiology. 2007; 2 (6):367–372. doi: 10.3923/ajpp.2007.367.372. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Cheng H, Wang S, Wei M, Yu Y, Wang C. Effect of leaf water extracts of four Asteraceae alien invasive plants on germination performance of Lactuca sativa L. under acid deposition. Plant Ecol. 2021; 222 :433–443. doi: 10.1007/s11258-021-01117-5. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Copolovici L, Ban A, Faur I, Copolovici D (2017) The influence of simulated acidic rain on plants volatile organic compounds emission and photosynthetic parameters. AgroLife, 73.
  • Cruz LP, Mota ER, Campos VP, Santana FO, Luz SR, Santos DF (2019) Inorganic and organic acids in the atmosphere of the urban area of the city of Salvador, Brazil. J Braz Chem Soc 30:904–914. 10.21577/0103-5053.20180227
  • da Silva LC, Azevedo AA, da Silva EAM, Oliva MA. Effects of simulated acid rain on the growth of five Brazilian tree species and anatomy of the most sensitive species ( Joannesia princeps ) Aust J Bot. 2005; 53 :789–796. doi: 10.1071/BT04096. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Datar SV, Mukhopadhyay B, Srivastava HN. Trends in background air pollution parameters over India. Atmos Environ. 1996; 30 :3677–3682. doi: 10.1016/1352-2310(96)00052-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Debnath B, Hussain M, Irshad M, Mitra S, Li M, Liu S, Qiu D. Exogenous melatonin mitigates acid rain stress to tomato plants through modulation of leaf ultrastructure, photosynthesis and antioxidant potential. Molefw. 2018; 23 :388. doi: 10.3390/molecules23020388. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Debnath B, Li M, Liu S, Pan T, Ma C, Qiu D. Melatonin-mediate acid rain stress tolerance mechanism through alteration of transcriptional factors and secondary metabolites gene expression in tomato. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020; 200 :110720. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110720. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Diatta J, Youssef N, Tylman O, Grzebisz W, Markert B, Drobek L, Lejwoda P. Acid rain induced leakage of Ca, Mg, Zn, Fe from plant photosynthetic organs–Testing for deciduous and dicotyledons. Ecol Indic. 2021; 121 :107210. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107210. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ding Z, Wang Q, Hu X. Fractionation of Zn and Pb in bulk soil and size fractions of water-stable micro-aggregates of lead/zinc tailing soil under simulated acid rain. Procedia Environ Sci Eng Manag. 2011; 10 :325–330. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.09.053. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dolatabadian A, Sanavy SAMM, Gholamhoseini M, Joghan AK, Majdi M, Kashkooli AB. The role of calcium in improving photosynthesis and related physiological and biochemical attributes of spring wheat subjected to simulated acid rain. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013; 19 :189–198. doi: 10.1007/s12298-013-0165-7. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dörter M, Mağat-Türk E, Döğeroğlu T, Özden-Üzmez Ö, Gaga EO, Karakaş D, Yenisoy-Karakaş S (2022) An assessment of spatial distribution and atmospheric concentrations of ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes: ozone formation potential and health risk estimation in Bolu city of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1-15.10.1007/s11356-022-19608-x [ PubMed ]
  • Driscoll CT, Wang Z (2019) Ecosystem effects of acidic deposition. In Encyclopedia of Water; American Cancer Society: New York, NY, USA, 1–12. 10.1002/9781119300762.wsts0043
  • Du E, Dong D, Zeng X, Sun Z, Jiang X, de Vries W. Direct effect of acid rain on leaf chlorophyll content of terrestrial plants in China. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 605 :764–769. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.044. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Duncan BN, Lamsal LN, Thompson AM, Yoshida Y, Lu Z, Streets DG, Pickering KE. A space-based, high-resolution view of notable changes in urban NOx pollution around the world (2005–2014) J Geophys Res Atmos. 2016; 121 :976–996. doi: 10.1002/2015JD024121. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Dursun A, Yildirim E, Güvenc I, Kumlay AM (2000) Effects of simulated acid rain on plant growth and yield of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum ). In II Balk Symp Vegetables Potatoes 579:245–248.10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.579.40
  • EEA (2013) European Union emission inventory report 1990–2011 under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP), European Environment Agency (EEA), Technical report No 10/2013. 10.2800/44480
  • Eguagie MO, Aiwansoba RP, Omofomwan KO, Oyanoghafo OO. Impact of simulated acid rain on the growth, yield and plant component of Abelmoschus caillei . J Adv Biol Biotechnol. 2016; 6 :1–6. doi: 10.9734/JABB/2016/24804. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Evans LS (1988) Effect of acidic decomposition on vegetation: State of science. In: Rao D.N., M. Yunus, K.J. Ahmad, S.N. Singh, (eds) Perspectives in environmental botany, today and tomorrows. Printers and Publishers, New Delhi, pp 73–119
  • Evans LS, Curry TM, Lewin KF. Responses of leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L. to simulated acidic rain. New Phytol. 1981; 88 :403–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1981.tb04089.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Evans LS, Gmur NF, Mancini D. Effects of simulated acidic rain on yields of Raphanus sativus, Lactuca sativa, Triticum aestivum and Medicago sativa . Environ Exp Bot. 1982; 22 :445–453. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(82)90055-7. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Evans LS, Lewin KF. Growth, development and yield responses of pinto beans and soybeans to hydrogen ion concentrations of simulated acidic rain. Environ Exp Bot. 1981; 21 :103–113. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(81)90015-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Evans LS, Lewin KF, Conway CA, Patti MJ. Seed yields (quantity and quality) of field-grown soybeans exposed to simulated acidic rain. New Phytol. 1981; 89 :459–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1981.tb02327.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Fang HJ, Yu GR, Cheng SL, Mo JM, Yan JH, Li S. 13 C abundance, water-soluble and microbial biomass carbon as potential indicators of soil organic carbon dynamics in subtropical forests at different successional stages and subject to different nitrogen loads. Plant Soil. 2009; 320 :243–254. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-9890-7. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Fei J, Ma J, Yang J, Liang Y, Ke Y, Yao L, Min X. Effect of simulated acid rain on stability of arsenic calcium residue in residue field. Environ Geochem Health. 2020; 42 :769–780. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00273-y. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Foell W (1995) RAINS-Asia: an assessment model for air pollution in Asia. Report on the World Bank Sponsored Project" Acid Rain and Emission Reduction in Asia"
  • Francis AJ. Effects of acidic precipitation and acidity on soil microbial processes. Water Air Soil Poll. 1982; 18 :375–394. doi: 10.1007/BF02419425. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Frey SD, Ollinger S, Nadelhoffer KE, Bowden R, Brzostek E, Burton A, Wickings K. Chronic nitrogen additions suppress decomposition and sequester soil carbon in temperate forests. Biogeochemistry. 2014; 121 :305–316. doi: 10.1007/s10533-014-0004-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Gao YF, Rong LP, Zhao DH, Zhang JQ, Chen JS. Effects of simulated acid rain on the photosynthetic physiology of Acer ginnala seedlings. Can J for Res. 2021; 51 :18–24. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2020-0091. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Garaga R, Chakraborty S, Zhang H, Gokhale S, Xue Q, Kota SH. Influence of anthropogenic emissions on wet deposition of pollutants and rainwater acidity in Guwahati, a UNESCO heritage city in Northeast India. Atmos Res. 2020; 232 :104683. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104683. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Gholami F, Tomas M, Gholami Z, Vakili M. Technologies for the nitrogen oxides reduction from flue gas: A review. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 714 :136712. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136712. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Gilani MM, Tigabu M, Liu B, Farooq TH, Rashid MHU, Ramzan M, Ma X. Seed germination and seedling emergence of four tree species of southern China in response to acid rain. J for Res. 2021; 32 :471–481. doi: 10.1007/s11676-020-01102-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Gioda A, Reyes‐Rodríguez GJ, Santos‐Figueroa G, Collett Jr JL, Decesari S, Ramos MDCK, Bezerra Netto HJ, de Aquino Neto FR, Mayol‐Bracero OL (2011) Speciation of water‐soluble inorganic, organic, and total nitrogen in a background marine environment: Cloud water, rainwater, and aerosol particles. J Geophys Res Atmos. 10.1029/2010JD015010
  • Global energy and CO 2 status report (2019). https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019
  • Gonçalves C, Santos MAD, Fornaro A, Pedrott JJ. Hydrogen peroxide in the rainwater of Sao Paulo megacity: measurements and controlling factors. J Braz Chem Soc. 2010; 21 :331–339. doi: 10.1590/S0103-50532010000200020. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Guo Y, Zhang J, Wang S, She F, Li J (2011) Chemical characteristics of atmospheric precipitation in spring and summer in Toyama, Japan. In 2011 Int Conf Remote Sens Environ Transp Eng 3917–3920. IEEE.10.1109/RSETE.2011.5965175
  • Haruna MY, Khan AA, Darma ZU (2016) Effect of acid rain on growth of Papaya ( Carica papaya ) and Castor (Ricinus communis ) plants. J Sci Technol 9:43–47. 10.18780/e-jst.v9i1.738
  • Heck WW, Heagle AS, Shriner DS. Hordeum vulgare exposed to long term fumigation with low concentration of SO 2 . Physiol Plant. 1986; 76 :445–450. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hernandez L, Probst A, Probst JL, Ulrich E. Heavy metal distribution in some French forest soils: evidence for atmospheric contamination. Sci Total Environ. 2003; 312 :195–219. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00223-7. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hosono T, Nouchi I. Effects of simulated acid rain on the growth of agricultural crops. J Agric Meteorol. 1993; 48 :743–746. doi: 10.2480/agrmet.48.743. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hu H, Hua W, Shen A, Zhou H, Sheng L, Lou W, Zhang G. Photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence of barley exposed to simulated acid rain. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021; 28 :42776–42786. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13807-8. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hu XF, Chen FS, Wine ML, Fang XM. Increasing acidity of rain in subtropical tea plantation alters aluminum and nutrient distributions at the root-soil interface and in plant tissues. Plant Soil. 2017; 417 :261–274. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3256-3. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Hu XF, Wu AQ, Wang FC, Chen FS. The effects of simulated acid rain on internal nutrient cycling and the ratios of Mg, Al, Ca, N, and P in tea plants of a subtropical plantation. Environ Monit Assess. 2019; 191 :1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7248-z. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Irie H, Muto T, Itahashi S, Kurokawa JI, Uno I. Turnaround of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide pollution trends in China, Japan, and South Korea. Sola. 2016; 12 :170–174. doi: 10.2151/sola.2016-035. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ismail OM, Zohair MM. Date palm pollen germination and growth susceptibility to different pH medium. J Agr Food Technol. 2013; 3 :26–30. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Itahashi S, Kurokawa J, Ohara T, Uno I, Fujita SI. The 36-Year Historical Variation of Precipitation Chemistry during 1976–2011 at Ryori WMO-GAW Station in Japan. SOLA. 2021 doi: 10.2151/sola.2021-032. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ito A, Wakamatsu S, Morikawa T, Kobayashi S (2021) 30 years of air quality trends in Japan. Atmosphere 12(8):1072. 10.3390/atmos12081072
  • Jang E, Do W, Park G, Kim M, Yoo E. Spatial and temporal variation of urban air pollutants and their concentrations in relation to meteorological conditions at four sites in Busan, South Korea. Atmos Pollut Res. 2017; 8 :89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2016.07.009. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Janta R, Sekiguchi K, Yamaguchi R, Sopajaree K, Plubin B, Chetiyanukornkul T (2020) Spatial and temporal variations of atmospheric PM10 and air pollutants concentration in upper Northern Thailand during 2006–2016. Appl Sci Eng Prog 13:256–267. 10.14416/j.asep.2020.03.007
  • Jiao R, Zhang M, Wei Z, Xu J, Zhang H. Alleviative effects of nitric oxide on Vigna radiata seedlings under acidic rain stress. Mol Biol Rep. 2021; 48 :2243–2251. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06244-w. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Keresztesi Á, Birsan MV, Nita IA, Bodor Z, Szép R. Assessing the neutralisation, wet deposition and source contributions of the precipitation chemistry over Europe during 2000–2017. Environ Sci Eur. 2019; 31 :1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12302-019-0234-9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Keresztesi Á, Nita IA, Boga R, Birsan MV, Bodor Z, Szép R. Spatial and long-term analysis of rainwater chemistry over the conterminous United States. Environ Res. 2020; 188 :109872. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109872. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Khare P, Satsangi GS, Kumar N, Kumari KM, Srivastava SS. HCHO, HCOOH and CH 3 COOH in air and rain water at a rural tropical site in north central India. Atmos Environ. 1997; 31 :3867–3875. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00263-X. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Khemani LT, Momin GA, Rao PSP, Pillai AG, Safai PD, Mohan K, Rao MG. Atmospheric pollutants and their influence on acidification of rain water at an industrial location on the west coast of India. Atmos Environ. 1994; 28 :3145–3154. doi: 10.1016/1352-2310(94)00148-E. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Killham K, Firestone MK, Mc Coll JG. Acid rain and soil microbial activity: effects and their mechanisms. J Environ Qual. 1983; 12 :133–137. doi: 10.2134/jeq1983.00472425001200010024x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kim AY, Kim JY, Ko MS, Kim KW. Acid rain impact on phytoavailability of heavy metals in soils. Geosystem Eng. 2010; 13 :133–138. doi: 10.1080/12269328.2010.10541320. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Knittel R, Pell EJ. Effects of drought stress and simulated acidic rain on foliar conductance of Zea mays L. Environ Exp Bot. 1991; 31 :79–90. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(91)90010-L. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kowalok ME. Common threads: Research lessons from acid rain, ozone depletion, and global warming. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev. 1993; 35 :12–38. doi: 10.1080/00139157.1993.9929107. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Krotkov NA, McLinden CA, Li C, Lamsal LN, Celarier EA, Marchenko SV, Swartz WH, Bucsela EJ, Joiner J, Duncan BN, Boersma KF (2016) Aura OMI observations of regional SO 2 and NO 2 pollution changes from 2005 to 2015.Atmos Chem Phys 16:605-4629. 10.5194/a5-2016
  • Kumar P, Yadav S, Kumar A. Sources and processes governing rainwater chemistry in New Delhi, India. Nat Hazards. 2014; 74 :2147–2162. doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1295-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Kuttippurath J, Patel VK, Pathak M, Singh A (2022) Improvements in SO 2 pollution in India: role of technology and environmental regulations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–13. 10.1007/s11356-022-21319-2 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
  • Le Bolloch O, Guerzoni S. Acid and alkaline deposition in precipitation on the Western coast of Sardinia, Central Mediterranean (40 N, 8 E) Wat Air Soil Poll. 1995; 85 :2155–2160. doi: 10.1007/BF01186153. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lee JJ, Neely GE, Perrigan SC, Grothaus LC. Effect of simulated sulfuric acid rain on yield, growth and foliar injury of several crops. Environ Exp Bot. 1981; 21 :171–185. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(81)90024-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lee JJ, Weber DE. The effect of simulated acid rain on seedling emergence and growth of eleven woody species. For Sci. 1979; 25 :393–398. doi: 10.1093/forestscience/25.3.393. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Legrand M, Preunkert S, Galy‐Lacaux C, Liousse C, Wagenbach D (2005) Atmospheric year‐round records of dicarboxylic acids and sulfate at three French sites located between 630 and 4360 m elevation. J Geophys Res Atmos 110:D13302. 10.1029/2004JD005515
  • Li C, McLinden C, Fioletov V, Krotkov N, Carn S, Joiner J, Streets D, He H, Ren X, Li Z, Dickerson RR (2017). India is overtaking China as the world’s largest emitter of anthropogenic sulfur dioxide. Sci Rep 7:1-7. 10.1038/s41598-017-14639-8 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
  • Li HR, Xiang HM, Zhong JW, Ren XQ, Wei H, Zhang JE, Zhao BL. Acid Rain Increases Impact of Rice Blast on Crop Health via Inhibition of Resistance Enzymes. Plants. 2020; 9 :881. doi: 10.3390/plants9070881. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Li J, Jia C, Lu Y, Tang S, Shim H. Multivariate analysis of heavy metal leaching from urban soils following simulated acid rain. Microchem J. 2015; 122 :89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2015.04.015. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Li J, Wu H, Jiang P, Fu C. Rainwater chemistry in a subtropical high-altitude mountain site, South China: Seasonality, source apportionment and potential factors. Atmos Environ. 2022; 268 :118786. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118786. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Li X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Pei C. Response of soil chemical properties and enzyme activity of four species in the Three Gorges Reservoir area to simulated acid rain. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021; 208 :111457. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111457. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liang Chanjuan, Ge Yuqing, Su Lei, Bu Jinjin. Response of plasma membrane H+-ATPase in rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings to simulated acid rain. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2015; 22 (1):535–545. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3389-3. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ling DJ, Huang QC, Ouyang Y. Impacts of simulated acid rain on soil enzyme activities in a latosol. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010; 73 :1914–1918. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.07.024. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu H, Ren X, Zhu J, Wu X, Liang C. Effect of exogenous abscisic acid on morphology, growth and nutrient uptake of rice ( Oryza sativa ) roots under simulated acid rain stress. Planta. 2018; 248 :647–659. doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-2922-x. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu TW, Niu L, Fu B, Chen J, Wu FH, Chen J, Zheng HL. A transcriptomic study reveals differentially expressed genes and pathways respond to simulated acid rain in Arabidopsis thaliana . Genome. 2013; 56 :49–60. doi: 10.1139/gen-2012-0090. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu X, Fu Z, Zhang B, Zhai L, Meng M, Lin J, Zhang J. Effects of sulfuric, nitric, and mixed acid rain on Chinese fir sapling growth in Southern China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018; 160 :154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.071. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu X, Li C, Meng M, Zhai L, Zhang B, Jia Z, Zhang J. Comparative effects of the recovery from sulfuric and nitric acid rain on the soil enzyme activities and metabolic functions of soil microbial communities. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 714 :136788. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136788. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu X, Meng M, Zhang Y, Li C, Ma S, Li Q, Zhang J. Effects of sulfuric, nitric, and mixed acid rain on the decomposition of fine root litter in Southern China. Ecol Process. 2021; 10 :1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13717-021-00334-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu X, Zhang B, Zhao W, Wang L, Xie D, Huo W, Zhang J. Comparative effects of sulfuric and nitric acid rain on litter decomposition and soil microbial community in subtropical plantation of Yangtze River Delta region. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 601 :669–678. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.151. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu XD, Feng YJ, Mo QF, Chu GW, Li YL, Zhang QM, Zhou Q. Long-term changes of water acidity in an intact forested watershed in south China. J Mt Sci. 2021; 18 (12):3138–3146. doi: 10.1007/s11629-021-6929-6. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu Z, Yang J, Zhang J, Xiang H, Wei H. A bibliometric analysis of research on acid rain. Sustainability. 2019; 11 :3077. doi: 10.3390/su11113077. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Lv Y, Wang C, Jia Y, Wang W, Ma X, Du J, Tian X. Effects of sulfuric, nitric, and mixed acid rain on litter decomposition, soil microbial biomass, and enzyme activities in subtropical forests of China. Appl Soil Ecol. 2014; 79 :1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.12.002. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Ma J, Zhong B, Khan MA, Wu D, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Xie X, Liu H, Liu D (2021) Transport of mobile particles in heavy metal contaminated soil with simulated acid rain leaching. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 106:965-969. 10.1007/s00128-021-03269-6 [ PubMed ]
  • Ma S, Chen W, Zhang J, Shen H (2020) Influence of simulated acid rain on the physiological response of flowering Chinese cabbage and variation of soil nutrients. Plant Soil Environ 66:648–657.10.17221/469/2020-PSE
  • Ma Y, Wang B, Zhang R, Gao Y, Zhang X, Li Y, Zuo Z. Initial simulated acid rain impacts reactive oxygen species metabolism and photosynthetic abilities in Cinnamonum camphora undergoing high temperature. Ind Crops Prod. 2019; 135 :352–361. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.050. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Majd A, Chehregani AH (1992) Studies on developmental processes in ovules of soya Glycine max L. Plants and effects of certain toxins and environmental pollutants. In: Int Symp Transplant Prod Syst 319:431–436.10.17660/ActaHortic.1992.319.67
  • Malaysia SA (1983) The state of the Malaysian environment 1983–1984. SAM, Penang, Malaysia (Original not seen: cited from McCormick, J. 1985. Acid earth. Earthscan Pub, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.)
  • Mallick S, Kumar A, Kumar P. Oxidation of HOSO[rad] by NH 2 [rad]: A new path for the formation of an acid rain precursor. Chem Phys Lett. 2021; 773 :138536. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.138536. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Maltz MR, Chen Z, Cao J, Arogyaswamy K, Shulman H, Aronson EL. Inoculation with Pisolithus tinctorius may ameliorate acid rain impacts on soil microbial communities associated with Pinus massoniana seedlings. Fungal Ecol. 2019; 40 :50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2018.11.011. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Mannings S, Smith S, Bell JNB. Effect of acid deposition on soil acidification and metal mobilisation. Appl Geochemistry. 1996; 11 :139–143. doi: 10.1016/0883-2927(95)00077-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Meenakshi S, Sharma VP. Effect of acid rain on the contents of leaves of Solanum melongena . J Plant Dev Sci. 2011; 3 :169–173. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Merino A, Fernandez V, Garcia-Rodeja E (1994) Effects of experimental acidification of acid soils from Galicia (NW Spain). II. Heavy metal mobilization, 3rd Int Symp Environ Geochem Kraków, Book of Abstracts, 280–281.
  • Milton MB, Abigael TO. Effects of simulated acid rain on the morphology, phenology and yield of Okra ( Abelmoschus esculentus (L). Moench) J Environ Sci Comp Sci Engg Technol. 2015; 4 :501–518. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Mishima SI, Kimura SD, Eguchi S, Shirato Y. Changes in soil available-nutrient stores and relationships with nutrient balance and crop productivity in Japan. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2013; 59 :371–379. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2013.786646. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Mo J, Zhang W, Zhu W, Gundersn P, Fang Y, Li D, Wang H. Nitrogen addition reduces soil respiration in a mature tropical forest in southern China. Glob Chang Biol. 2008; 14 :403–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01503.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Mohajan H (2018) Acid rain is a local environment pollution but global concern. 47–55
  • Moreda-Piñeiro J, Alonso-Rodríguez E, Moscoso-Pérez C, Blanco-Heras G, Turnes-Carou I, López-Mahía P, Prada-Rodríguez D. Influence of marine, terrestrial and anthropogenic sources on ionic and metallic composition of rainwater at a suburban site (northwest coast of Spain) Atmos Environ. 2014; 88 :30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.067. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Munzuroglu O, Obek E, Geckil H. Effects of simulated acid rain on the pollen germination and pollen tube growth of apple ( Malus sylvestris miller cv. golden) Acta Biol Hung. 2003; 54 :95–103. doi: 10.1556/ABiol.54.2003.1.10. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Nandlal Hemlata Singh, Sachan Priti (2017) Simulated Acid Rain-induced Alterations in Flowering, Leaf Abscission and Pollen Germination in Sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.). Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management 21(2):290. 10.4314/jasem.v21i2.9
  • National Automobile Scrappage Policy (2021) Ministry of road transport and highways website. https://morth.nic.in/vehiclescrapping-policy-overview
  • Neufeld HS, Jernstedt JA, Haines BL. Direct foliar effects of simulated acid rain: I. Damage, growth and gas exchange. New Phytol. 1985; 99 :389–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1985.tb03667.x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Neves NR, Oliva MA, da Cruz CD, Costa AC, Ribas RF, Pereira EG. Photosynthesis and oxidative stress in the restinga plant species Eugenia uniflora L. exposed to simulated acid rain and iron ore dust deposition: potential use in environmental risk assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2009; 407 :3740–3745. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.035. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Odiyi BO, Bamidele JF. Effects of simulated acid rain on growth and yield of Cassava Manihot esculenta (Crantz) J Agric Sci. 2014; 6 :96. doi: 10.5539/jas.v6n1p96. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Odiyi BO, Eniola AO. The effect of simulated acid rain on plant growth component of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) L. Walps Jordan J Biol Sci. 2015; 8 :51–54. doi: 10.12816/0026948. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Paulot F, Wunch D, Crounse JD, Toon GC, Millet DB, DeCarlo PF, Wennberg PO. Importance of secondary sources in the atmospheric budgets of formic and acetic acids. Atmos Chem Phys. 2011; 11 :1989–2013. doi: 10.5194/acpd-10-24435-2010. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Peña RM, García S, Herrero C, Losada M, Vázquez A, Lucas T. Organic acids and aldehydes in rainwater in a northwest region of Spain. Atmos Environ. 2002; 36 :5277–5288. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00648-9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Pham Ha T. T., Nguyen An Thinh, Do Anh T. Ngoc., Hens Luc. Impacts of Simulated Acid Rain on the Growth and the Yield of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) in the Mountains of Northern Vietnam. Sustainability. 2021; 13 (9):4980. doi: 10.3390/su13094980. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Polishchuk OV, Vodka MV, Belyavskaya NA, Khomochkin AP, Zolotareva EK. The effect of acid rain on ultrastructure and functional parameters of photosynthetic apparatus in pea leaves. Cell Tissue Biol. 2016; 10 :250–257. doi: 10.1134/S1990519X16030093. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Popova T, Petrova T, Petrichev M, Valyova M. Action of activated waters on plants after adverse chemical effects, imitating acid rain. Bulg J Agric Sci. 2019; 25 :638–645. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Prathibha P, Kothai P, Saradhi IV, Pandit GG, Puranik VD. Chemical characterization of precipitation at a coastal site in Trombay, Mumbai, India. Environ Monit Assess. 2010; 168 :45–53. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1090-7. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Rahman MM, Mahamud S, Thurston GD. Recent spatial gradients and time trends in Dhaka, Bangladesh, air pollution and their human health implications. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019; 69 :478–501. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2018.1548388. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Raju R, Paul AG, Aguilor UP, Capili JT (2021) The Effect of Induced Acid Rain; Allium cepa Chromosomal Aberration Assay. Sch Acad J Biosci 9:89–97. 10.36347/sajb.2021.v09i03.005
  • Ramlall C, Varghese B, Ramdhani S, Pammenter NW, Bhatt A, Berjak P. Effects of simulated acid rain on germination, seedling growth and oxidative metabolism of recalcitrant-seeded Trichilia dregeana grown in its natural seed bank. Physiol Plant. 2015; 153 :149–160. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12230. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Renzoni, GC, Viegi, L (1991) In vitro sensitivity of Pinus pinaster and P. pinea pollen grains to different pH values. Ann Bot Fenn 28(2):135–142
  • Rao PSP, Tiwari S, Matwale JL, Pervez S, Tunved P, Safai PD, Hopke PK. Sources of chemical species in rainwater during monsoon and non-monsoonal periods over two mega cities in India and dominant source region of secondary aerosols. Atmos Environ. 2016; 146 :90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.069. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Rodríguez-Sánchez VM, Rosas U, Calva-Vásquez G, Sandoval-Zapotitla E. Does acid rain alter the leaf anatomy and photosynthetic pigments in urban trees? Plants. 2020; 9 :862. doi: 10.3390/plants9070862. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Roy A, Chatterjee A, Tiwari S, Sarkar C, Das SK, Ghosh SK, Raha S. Precipitation chemistry over urban, rural and high altitude Himalayan stations in eastern India. Atmos Res. 2016; 181 :44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.06.005. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Sen TK, Khilar KC. Review on subsurface colloids and colloid-associated contaminant transport in saturated porous media. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2006; 119 :71–96. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2005.09.001. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Shah J, Nagpal T, Johnson T, Amann M, Carmichael G, Foell W, Streets D. Integrated analysis for acid rain in Asia: policy implications and results of RAINS-ASIA model. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2000; 25 :339–375. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.339. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Shah V, Jacob D, Moch JM, Wang X, Zhai S (2020). Global modeling of cloudwater acidity, rainwater acidity, and acid inputs to ecosystems. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts A74–13.
  • Shivashankara GP, Ranga K, Ramalingaiah M. Characterisation of bulk precipitation in industrial areas of Bangalore city. Indian J Environ Health. 1999; 41 :229–238. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Shripal N, Pal KS, Kumar N. Effects of simulated acid rain on yield and carbohydrate contents of green pepper. Advan Plant Sci. 2000; 13 :85–88. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Shu X, Zhang K, Zhang Q, Wang W (2019) Ecophysiological responses of Jatropha curcas L. seedlings to simulated acid rain under different soil types. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 185:1-12. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109705 [ PubMed ]
  • Singh A, Agrawal M. Response of two cultivars of Triticum aestivum L. to simulated acid rain. Environ Pollut. 1996; 91 :161–167. doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(95)00056-9. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Singh A, Agrawal M. Acid rain and its ecological consequences. J Environ Biol. 2007; 29 :15. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Singh AK, Mondal GC, Kumar S, Singh KK, Kamal KP, Sinha A. Precipitation chemistry and occurrence of acid rain over Dhanbad, coal city of India. Environ Monit Assess. 2007; 125 :99–110. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-9243-4. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Singh B, Agrawal M. Impact of simulated acid rain on growth and yield of two cultivars of wheat. Wat Air Soil Poll. 2004; 152 :71–80. doi: 10.1023/B:WATE.0000015331.02874.df. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Singh N, Yunus M, Singh SN, Ahmad KJ. Performance of Vicia faba plants in relation to simulated acid rain and/or endosulphan treatment. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1992; 48 :243–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00194378. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Singh RK, Agrawal M. Atmospheric depositions around a heavily industrialized area in a seasonally dry tropical environment of India. Environ Pollut. 2005; 138 :142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.02.009. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Sinsabaugh RL. Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010; 42 :391–404. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.014. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Smith RA (1872) Air and rain: the beginnings of a chemical climatology. Longmans, Green, and Company, 600pp, London.
  • Sridharan PV, Saksena S (1990) Description of acid rain problem in India. In: Second Annual Workshop on Acid Rain and Emissions in Asia. Bangkok, Thailand
  • Sullivan TS, Barth VP, Lewis RW (2017) Soil acidity impacts beneficial soil microorganisms. Washington State University Extension and the U.S. Department of Agriculture 1-6.
  • Sun X, Wang Y, Li H, Yang X, Sun L, Wang X, Wang W. Organic acids in cloud water and rainwater at a mountain site in acid rain areas of South China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016; 23 :9529–9539. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6038-1. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Sutton MA, Drewer J, Moring A, Adhya TK, Ahmed A, Bhatia A, Brownlie W, Dragosits U, Ghude SD, Hillier J, Hooda S (2017) The Indian nitrogen challenge in a global perspective. The Indian Nitrogen Assessment. 10.1016/B978-0-12-811836-8.00002-1
  • Swartz JS, Van Zyl PG, Beukes JP, Labuschagne C, Brunke EG, Portafaix T, Pienaar JJ. Twenty-one years of passive sampling monitoring of SO 2 , NO 2 and O 3 at the Cape Point GAW station. South Africa Atmos Environ. 2020; 222 :117128. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117128. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Tang L, Lin Y, He X, Han G. Acid rain decelerates the decomposition of Cunninghamia lanceolata needle and Cinnamomum camphora leaf litters in a karst region in China. Ecol Res. 2019; 34 :193–200. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811836-8.00002-1. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Tiwari S, Hopke PK, Thimmaiah D, Dumka UC, Srivastava AK, Bisht DS, Tripathi SN. Nature and sources of ionic species in precipitation across the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2016; 16 :943–957. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2015.06.0423. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Tiwari S, Srivastava MK, Bisht DS (2008) Chemical composition of rainwater in Panipat, an industrial city in Haryana. Indian J Radio Space Phys 37:443–449.
  • Tong S, Zhang L (2014) Differential sensitivity of growth and net photosynthetic rates in five tree species seedlings under simulated acid rain stress. Pol J Environ Stud 23(6): 2259-2264. 10.15244/pjoes/24930
  • US EPA progress report (2013) 2012 Progress report, clean air markets. https://www3.epa.gov/airmarkets/progress/reports/ , https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/arpcair12_02.pdf
  • Varma GS. Impact of soil-derived aerosols on precipitation acidity in India. Atmos Environ. 1989; 23 :2723–2728. doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(89)90552-0. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Varma GS. Background trends of pH of precipitation over India. Atmos Environ. 1989; 23 :747–751. doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(89)90476-9. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Waghmare VV, Aslam MY, Yang L, Safai PD, Pandithurai G (2021) Inorganic Ionic Composition of Rainwater at a High Altitude Station over the Western Ghats in Peninsular India. J Atmos Chem 78:59–76. 10.1007/s10874-021-09416-x
  • Wang B, Wang C, Xue R, Liu M, Xu G, Li Z (2021). Earthworm and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve plant hormones and antioxidant enzymes to alleviate simulated acid rain stress. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-438862/v1
  • Wang Y, Xu Y, Li D, Tang B, Man S, Jia Y, Xu H. Vermicompost and biochar as bio-conditioners to immobilize heavy metal and improve soil fertility on cadmium contaminated soil under acid rain stress. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 621 :1057–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.121. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Watanabe K, Honoki H. Measurements of aerosol number concentrations and rainwater chemistry at Mt. Tateyama, near the coast of the Japan sea in central Japan: On the influence of high-elevation Asian dust particles in autumn. J Atmos Chem. 2013; 70 :115–129. doi: 10.1007/s10874-013-9258-5. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Wei H, Liu Y, Xiang H, Zhang J, Li S, Yang J. Soil pH responses to simulated acid rain leaching in three agricultural soils. Sustainability. 2020; 12 :280. doi: 10.3390/su12010280. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Wei X, Blanco JA, Jiang H, Kimmins JH. Effects of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration in Chinese fir forest ecosystems. Sci Total Environ. 2012; 416 :351–361. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.087. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Wen K, Liang C, Wang L, Hu G, Zhou Q. Combined effects of lanthanum ion and acid rain on growth, photosynthesis and chloroplast ultrastructure in soybean seedlings. Chemosphere. 2011; 84 :601–608. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.054. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Wertheim FS, Craker LE. Effects of acid rain on corn silks and pollen germination. J Environ Qual. 1988; 17 :135–138. doi: 10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800010023x. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • World energy outlook 2019 assessed from https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019
  • World Health Organization (WHO), world air quality report 2018. https://www.iqair.com/world-most-polluted . cities/world-air-quality-report-2018-en.pdf
  • Wu J, Liang G, Hui D, Deng Q, Xiong X, Qiu Q, Zhang D. Prolonged acid rain facilitates soil organic carbon accumulation in a mature forest in Southern China. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 544 :94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.025. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Xu Z, Wu Y, Liu WJ, Liang CS, Ji J, Zhao T, Zhang X. Chemical composition of rainwater and the acid neutralizing effect at Beijing and Chizhou city, China. Atmos Res. 2015; 164 :278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.05.009. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Yadav DS, Jaiswal B, Gautam M, Agrawal M (2020) Soil Acidification and its Impact on Plants. In: Plant Responses to Soil Pollution. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–26 10.1007/978-981-15-4964-9_1
  • Yang L, Xu Y, Zhang R, Wang X, Yang C. Comprehensive transcriptome profiling of soybean leaves in response to simulated acid rain. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018; 158 :18–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.015. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Yin P, Peng YJ, Song CC, Liu XJ, Huang J, Lv X (2021). Effects of simulated acid rain on Growth of Lolium perenne . In: IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. IOP Publishing, pp 022078. 10.1088/1755-1315/714/2/022078
  • Zhang C, Yi X, Zhou F, Gao X, Wang M, Chen J, Shen C. Comprehensive transcriptome profiling of tea leaves ( Camellia sinensis ) in response to simulated acid rain. Sci Hortic. 2020; 272 :109491. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109491. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhang JE, Ouyang Y, Ling DJ. Impacts of simulated acid rain on cation leaching from the Latosol in south China. Chemosphere. 2007; 67 :2131–2137. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.095. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhao C, Sun Y, Zhong Y, Xu S, Liang Y, Liu S, He M. Spatio-temporal analysis of urban air pollutants throughout China during 2014–2019. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2021; 14 :1619–1632. doi: 10.1007/s11869-021-01043-5. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zheng W, Li R, Yang Q, Zhang W, Huang K, Guan X, Wang S. Short-term response of soil respiration to simulated acid rain in Cunninghamia lanceolata and Michelia acclurei plantations. J Soils Sediments. 2019; 19 :1239–1249. doi: 10.1007/s11368-018-2148-3. [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhou S, Zhang M, Chen S, Xu W, Zhu L, Gong S, Wang P. Acid resistance of Masson pine ( Pinus massoniana Lamb.) families and their root morphology and physiological response to simulated acid deposition. Sci Rep. 2020; 10 :1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79043-1. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhou X, Xu Z, Liu W, Wu Y, Zhao T, Jiang H, Zhang X, Zhang J, Zhou L, Wang Y. Chemical composition of precipitation in Shenzhen, a coastal mega-city in South China: Influence of urbanization and anthropogenic activities on acidity and ionic composition. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 662 :218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.096. [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

thumbnail

Acid precipitation; an annotated bibliography

  • Document: Report (pdf)
  • Download citation as: RIS | Dublin Core

Book cover

Encyclopedia of Hydrology and Water Resources pp 36–38 Cite as

  • R. W. Herschy ,
  • V. P. Singh ,
  • V. Aravamuthan ,
  • M. Robbins Church &
  • John E. Oliver  
  • Reference work entry
  • First Online: 01 January 2016

37 Accesses

Part of the Encyclopedia of Earth Science book series (EESS)

Acid rain has become one of the major environmental problems facing industralized countries, Much has been written on the subject, often with political rhetoric and emotional speculation providing the theme. Despite this, evidence points to the existence of a problem that will be of increasing concern in the future.

Assessing the nature of acid rain and its potential impact requires background information concerning the concept of acidity and ways in which atmospheric processes influence the potential for the deposition of an acid by precipitation processes.

The acidity of a substance is associated with the relative abundance of free hydrogen ions (H + ) when that substance is in a water solution. Acidity is measured on a logarithmic pH scale where a value of 7 indicates neutrality; decreasing values on the scale indicate increasing acidity and increasing values represent alkalinity. The pH scale with representative examples is shown in Table A11 .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Bibliography

Howells, G., 1990. Acid Rain and Acid Water. London: Ellis Horwood.

Google Scholar  

Miller, J.M., 1984. Acid rain, Weatherwise, 37, 232–239.

Article   Google Scholar  

National Academy of Science, 1983. Acid Deposition: Atmospheric Processes in Eastern North America. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Park, C., 1989. Acid Rain: New Approach to an Old Problem. New York: Routledge.

Peters, N.E., R.A. Schroeder and D.E. Troutman, 1982. Temporal Trends in The Acidity of Precipitation and Surface Waters of New York, US Geol. Survey Water Supply Paper 2188. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Wisniewski, J. and J.D. Kinsman, 1982. An overview of acid rain monitoring activities in North America, Am. Meteorol. Soc. Bull. 63, 598–618.

Cross references

Acidic deposition: acidification of surface water Precipitation

Download references

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Rights and permissions.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Herschy, R.W. et al. (1998). Acid rain . In: Herschy, R.W., Fairbridge, R.W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Hydrology and Water Resources. Encyclopedia of Earth Science. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4497-7_6

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4497-7_6

Published : 21 August 2016

Publisher Name : Springer, Dordrecht

Print ISBN : 978-0-412-74060-2

Online ISBN : 978-1-4020-4497-7

eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive

Share this entry

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Publish with us

Policies and ethics

  • Find a journal
  • Track your research

Acid rain: Causes, effects and solutions

How acid rain affects nearly everything it touches, and what we can do about it.

A forest in the Czech Republic, decimated by acid rain from a nearby power plant.

Solutions and prevention

Additional resources, bibliography.

Acid rain, or acid deposition, is a broad term that includes any form of precipitation that contains acidic components, such as sulfuric acid or nitric acid. The precipitation is not necessarily wet or liquid; the definition includes dust, gases, rain, snow, fog and hail. The type of acid rain that contains water is called wet deposition. Acid rain formed with dust or gases is called dry deposition.

The precipitation is not necessarily wet or liquid; the definition includes dust, gasses, rain, snow, fog and hail. The type of acid rain that contains water is called wet deposition. Acid rain formed with dust or gasses is called dry deposition.

Causes of acid rain

The term acid rain was coined in 1852 by Scottish chemist Robert Angus Smith, according to the Royal Society of Chemistry, which calls him the "father of acid rain." Smith decided on the term while examining rainwater chemistry near industrial cities in England and Scotland. He wrote about his findings in 1872 in the book " Air and Rain: The Beginnings of a Chemical Climatology ." 

In the 1950s, scientists in the United States started studying the phenomenon, and in the 1960s and early 1970s, acid rain became recognized as a regional environmental issue that affected Western Europe and eastern North America.

Though manmade pollutants are currently affecting most acidic precipitation, natural disasters can be a factor as well. For example, volcanoes can cause acid rain by blasting pollutants into the air. These pollutants can be carried around the world in jet streams and turned into acid rain far from the volcano. After an asteroid supposedly wiped out the dinosaurs 65.5 million years ago, sulfur trioxide was blasted into the air. When it hit the air, it turned into sulfuric acid, generating a downpour of acid rain.

Even before that, over 4 billion years ago, it is suspected that the air may have had 10,000 times as much carbon dioxide as today. Geologists from the University of Wisconsin-Madison backed up this theory by studying rocks and publishing the results in a 2008 issue of the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters. "At [those levels of carbon dioxide], you would have had vicious acid rain and intense greenhouse [effects]. That is a condition that will dissolve rocks," said study team member John Valley.

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) released into the air by fossil-fuel power plants, vehicles and oil refineries are the biggest cause of acid rain today, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Two thirds of sulfur dioxide and one fourth of nitrogen oxide found in the atmosphere come from electric power generators. 

A chemical reaction happens when sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides mix with water, oxygen and other chemicals in the air. They then become sulfuric and nitric acids that mix with precipitation and fall to the ground. Precipitation is considered acidic when its pH level is about 5.2 or below. The normal pH of rain is around 5.6.

Environmental affects of acid rain

Acid rain affects nearly everything. Plants, soil, trees, buildings and even statues can be transformed by the precipitation.

Acid rain has been found to be very hard on trees. It weakens them by washing away the protective film on leaves, and it stunts growth. A United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) study showed that acid rain is particularly hard on trees.

"By providing the only preserved soil in the world collected before the acid rain era, the Russians helped our international team track tree growth for the first time with changes in soil from acid rain," said Greg Lawrence, a U.S. Geological Survey scientist. "We've known that acid rain acidifies surface waters, but this is the first time we've been able to compare and track tree growth in forests that include soil changes due to acid rain." 

Acid rain can also change the composition of soil and bodies of water, making them uninhabitable for local animals and plants. For example, healthy lakes have a pH of 6.5 or higher. As acid rain raises the level of acidity, fish tend to die off. Most fish species can't survive a water pH of below 5. When the pH becomes a 4, the lake is considered dead, according to National Atmospheric Deposition Program .

It can additionally deteriorate limestone and marble buildings and monuments, like gravestones. 

There are several solutions to stopping human-caused acid rain. Regulating the emissions coming from vehicles and buildings is an important step, according to the EPA. This can be done by restricting the use of fossil fuels and focusing on more renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power.

Related: How do solar panels work?

Also, each person can do their part by reducing their vehicle use. Using public transportation, walking, riding a bike or carpooling is a good start, according to the EPA. People can also reduce their use of electricity, which is widely created with fossil fuels , or switch to a solar plan. Many electricity companies offer solar packages to their customers that require no installation and low costs. 

It is also possible to prevent acid rain forming, by adding lime deposits to major water sources. This method has been used to neutralize the Ph levels in the water, which reduced the acidity, for thousands of years, the LA Times reported . These so-called "liming" operations have also been used to restore wildlife. In Wales, a liming operation was conducted in 2003 to restore salmon to the Wye river. The water had become too acidic for the fish to survive, causing them to disappear from the river 18 years earlier, Young People's Trust for the Environment , a U.K. non-profit organization, reported.

Discover key facts about acid rain on Young Peoples Trust for the Environment , watch this National Geographic video about the role of fossil fuels and pollution in creating acid rain, and learn more about what the WWF is doing to reduce emissions.

  • Peringe Grennfelt, Anna Engleryd, Martin Forsius, Øystein Hov, Henning Rodhe & Ellis Cowling: Acid rain and air pollution: 50 years of progress in environmental science and policy
  • Douglas A.Burns, Julian Aherne, David A.Gay, Christopher M.B.Lehmann: Acid rain and its environmental effects: Recent scientific advances
  • Lesley Evans Ogden: Acid Rain: Researchers Addressing Its Lingering Effects  

Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now

Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.

Alina Bradford

We may need a new 'Category 6' hurricane level for winds over 192 mph, study suggests

Extremely rare 'rainbow clouds' light up Arctic skies for 3 days in a row

NASA's Voyager 1 probe hasn't 'spoken' in 3 months and needs a 'miracle' to save it

Internet Archive Audio

bibliography acid rain

  • This Just In
  • Grateful Dead
  • Old Time Radio
  • 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
  • Audio Books & Poetry
  • Computers, Technology and Science
  • Music, Arts & Culture
  • News & Public Affairs
  • Spirituality & Religion
  • Radio News Archive

bibliography acid rain

  • Flickr Commons
  • Occupy Wall Street Flickr
  • NASA Images
  • Solar System Collection
  • Ames Research Center

bibliography acid rain

  • All Software
  • Old School Emulation
  • MS-DOS Games
  • Historical Software
  • Classic PC Games
  • Software Library
  • Kodi Archive and Support File
  • Vintage Software
  • CD-ROM Software
  • CD-ROM Software Library
  • Software Sites
  • Tucows Software Library
  • Shareware CD-ROMs
  • Software Capsules Compilation
  • CD-ROM Images
  • ZX Spectrum
  • DOOM Level CD

bibliography acid rain

  • Smithsonian Libraries
  • FEDLINK (US)
  • Lincoln Collection
  • American Libraries
  • Canadian Libraries
  • Universal Library
  • Project Gutenberg
  • Children's Library
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library
  • Books by Language
  • Additional Collections

bibliography acid rain

  • Prelinger Archives
  • Democracy Now!
  • Occupy Wall Street
  • TV NSA Clip Library
  • Animation & Cartoons
  • Arts & Music
  • Computers & Technology
  • Cultural & Academic Films
  • Ephemeral Films
  • Sports Videos
  • Videogame Videos
  • Youth Media

Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet.

Mobile Apps

  • Wayback Machine (iOS)
  • Wayback Machine (Android)

Browser Extensions

Archive-it subscription.

  • Explore the Collections
  • Build Collections

Save Page Now

Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future.

Please enter a valid web address

  • Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape

International bibliography of acid rain, 1977-1986

Bookreader item preview, share or embed this item, flag this item for.

  • Graphic Violence
  • Explicit Sexual Content
  • Hate Speech
  • Misinformation/Disinformation
  • Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
  • Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata

[WorldCat (this item)]

plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews

Download options.

No suitable files to display here.

PDF access not available for this item.

IN COLLECTIONS

Uploaded by station64.cebu on February 11, 2023

SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata)

Title: Acid rain bibliography

  • Full Record
  • Other Related Research

This bibliography identifies 900 citations on various aspects of Acid Rain, covering published bibliographies, books, reports, conference and symposium proceedings, audio visual materials, pamphlets and newsletters. It includes five sections: citations index (complete record of author, title, source, order number); KWIC index; title index; author index; and source index. 900 references.

Citation Formats

  • CSV / Excel

Similar records in OSTI.GOV collections:

  • Similar Records

Research Vine

Research Vine

Annotated Bibliography – Acid Rain in the Twenty-First Century

Annotated Bibliography

According to Jeffery Wilson, Ph.d in Environmental Sciences, in his article “Acid Rain in the Twenty-First Century” agricultural run-off, industrial dumping, and acid rain are the three main reasons for the decline in the water systems in the world. First, he states that agricultural run-off has contaminated at least 25% of the water supplies in Southern America (351). For example, when the pond water from local ponds was tested in June 2007, scientists found that an overgrowth of algae due to the contamination of over fertilization had caused one-half of the fish that normally habitat the area to be non-existent (350). Second, he admonishes that industrialized dumping has shown to have affected water supplies in all regions of the country (358). For instance, added to the list of rivers contaminated by this procedure is the _______ in which numbers of fish were found floating just below the site of the company, yet the fish were healthy and plentiful in the waters before reaching the site of the company (353). Finally, he notes that acid rain due to car emissions and industrial smokestacks that emit poisons into the air are also contributing to the decreasing health of fresh water (351). For example, when rain water was tested in 2011, there was a thirty-three percent correlation between the amount of acid found within the water to the acid found within the water supplies in areas in which it had rained when the water and the rain were tested at the same time (378). Therefore, this article will be helpful in proving that the habits of the agricultural, industrialized, and automotive industries should be modified in order to save the earth’s water supplies and thus humanity.

Zetterfield, Sally. “No Time to Waste in Saving Our Water Supplies.” Journal of the World and the

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on  Annotated Bibliography – Acid Rain in the Twenty-First Century completed on time. avoid delay and –  ORDER NOW

Environment. April 2 2006: 25-30. Ebsco Host. Web. 19 Mar. 2013. <http:www. xxxxxx>.

Sally Zetterfield, Professor at ______, in her article “No Time to Waste in Saving Our WaterSupplies,” states that agricultural run-off, industrialized dumping, and acid rain

should be of concern when analyzing the ever growing problem of water pollution. First, she states that inthe state of _______, the water supplies near the _______ were found

to have contaminates that could eventually lead to the water in the area being considered undrinkable, once again indicating that the farming system may be unknowingly

causing harm to society’s very needed water supply and must be investigated if humanity is going to survive (28). Next, she states….continue as with example 1.

Your sources will include one.gov article (USA.gov); one journal article from GALILEO (Ebsco Host or Proquest; one book or one essay from a book of essays from E-Books; one article from Fed Stats; one website that discusses three organizations that sponsor the human interest cause for which you are researching, and any other sources of your choosing, except Wikipedia, which should not be included in your source work; If you are working on the Death Penalty Project, you will include one item from The Innocence Project ; one article from Fed Stats, one article from Death Penalty.org, and both the Bruck and the Koch Essays instead; and any other sources of your choosing, except Wikipedia, which should not be included in your source work. Directions for research can be found in the Research Tips included in your folder.

Articles must be 7+ pages and no more than 10 years in publication.

Examples should be a combination of statistics and persons to whom or places at which what you are describing has happened.

Order a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A

Order Solution Now

Similar Posts

Describe three (3) major characteristics of your audience (official position, decision-making power,.

Select a topic on which your persuasive writing paper will be focused. Write a one to two (1-2) page research proposal in which you: Identify the topic you selected and explain two (2) reasons for using it. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. Describe three (3) major characteristics of your audience…

snhu ol125 week 8 discussion latest 2017 october

Week 8 discussion Reflecting on the “Big Picture” Consider the results that you received on all of the self-assessments you have taken so far this term and the culture of your organization. Where are the areas of conflict? How do you work through these conflicts, and what aspects of the culture keep you at the…

A police officer at the scene of an accident

Communication in Criminal Justice Roles A police officer at the scene of an accident. A parole officer meeting with an ex-offender. A corrections officer in a prison. All of the criminal justice professionals above use communication skills, both written and verbal. Many of them also will likely use presentation skills. Mastering various ways in which…

AOS 101 – Explain why the surface water temperature

. Explain why the surface water temperature along the equator is generallyI colder that 1wateron either side of the equator {this is especially true in the eastern edges of the equatorialPacific and Atla ntic}. In 1,Irour explanation, use the fact that winds in the tropics are generally[easterly. [Draw a diagram if it helps}.

Nr601 week 2 discussion part 1 and 2

Discussion Part One (graded) B.J., a 70-year-old black female has been seen in the clinic several times. The last time she was in for a check-up was 6 months ago to get her prescriptions refilled. She has returned to the clinic today because she “ran out of blood pressure medicine” and would like to get…

hum410 module 7 discussion latest 2017 november

Module 7 discussion Please provide two suggestions, from the textbook and/or outside sources, for overcoming writer’s block. Also, provide three suggestions that you use to handle writer’s block. Which of these has been most successful for you?

Username or Email Address

Remember Me

Lost your password?

Don't have an account yet? Sign up

IMAGES

  1. Acid Rain Bibliography: Buy Acid Rain Bibliography Online at Low Price

    bibliography acid rain

  2. Acid Rain

    bibliography acid rain

  3. Essay on Acid Rain

    bibliography acid rain

  4. (PDF) Acid rain

    bibliography acid rain

  5. Acid Rain Bibliography: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    bibliography acid rain

  6. Acid Rain Infographic Poster on Behance

    bibliography acid rain

VIDEO

  1. DR. JHATKA MADE SAMOSA RAIN FROM CLOUDS 😂 (CARTOON SERIES) #shorts

  2. ACID RAIN || PART 1||#film #cartoon #explainedinhindi#movieexplained #shorts#shortfeed

  3. Acid Rain #shorts #science

  4. Sulphuric acid rain on Venus planet

COMMENTS

  1. ACID RAIN, CAUSES, EFFECTS AND CONTROL STRATEGIES

    ... SO 2 does not react much in the atmospheric chemicals but it can travel quicker to long distances and when get contact with ozone or hydrogen peroxide it produces SO 3 , which is highly soluble...

  2. Global Trends of Acidity in Rainfall and Its Impact on Plants and Soil

    Acid rain (AR) is a prominent environmental issue that has emerged in the last hundred years. AR refers to any form of precipitation leading to a reduction in pH to less than 5.6.

  3. Acid precipitation; an annotated bibliography

    This collection of 1660 bibliographies references on the causes and environmental effects of acidic atmospheric deposition was compiled from computerized literature searches of earth-science and chemistry data bases. Categories of information are (1) atmospheric chemistry (gases and aerosols), (2) precipitation chemistry, (3) transport and deposition (wet and dry), (4) aquatic environments ...

  4. Acid Rain

    The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) refers to acid rain as a broad term that encompasses acidic particles and vapors deposited through dry and wet deposition. Wet deposition occurs in wet precipitation (such as rain, sleet, hail, snow, fog, or mist), with a pH normally less than 5.6. Half of atmospheric acidity falls to the ground as ...

  5. Acid rain

    acid rain, precipitation possessing a pH of about 5.2 or below primarily produced from the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO 2) and nitrogen oxides (NO x; the combination of NO and NO 2) from human activities, mostly the combustion of fossil fuels.

  6. Acid Rain: A Selective Bibliography. Second Edition. Bibliography

    Acid Rain: A Selective Bibliography. Second Edition. Bibliography Series Twenty-One. O'Neill, Gertrudis, Comp. Acid rain is a term for rain, snow, or other precipitation produced from water vapor in the air reacting with emissions from automobiles, factories, power plants, and other oil and coal burning sources.

  7. Browse subject: Acid rain -- United States -- Bibliography

    Acid rain--CZMA hearings before the Subcommittee on Oceanography of the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, House of Representatives, Ninety-seventh Congress, first session, on interagency task force on acid precipitation (joint with Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the Environment), June 19, 1981; proposed rule ...

  8. PDF DOCUMENT RESUME ED 301 422 AUTHOR O'Neill, Gertrudis, Comp ...

    TITLE Acid Rain: A Selective Bibliography. Second Edition. Bibliography Series Twenty-One. INSTITUTION California Polytechnic State Univ., San Luis Obispo. Library. PUB DATE. 88. NOTE. 34p. PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Acid Rain; Biological Sciences; Botany; *College

  9. Acid rain

    Acid rain is also thought to have a detrimental effect on forests. Trees may be injured by the direct action of acid on leaves or by changes in soil chemistry caused by the acid solution. ... Bibliography. Howells, G., 1990. Acid Rain and Acid Water. London: Ellis Horwood. Google Scholar Miller, J.M., 1984. Acid rain, Weatherwise, 37, 232-239 ...

  10. Acid Rain: Overview and Abstracts

    Acid Rain: Overview and Abstracts - Carter N. Lane - Google Books 'Acid rain' is a broad term used to describe several ways that acids fall out of the atmosphere. A more precise term is acid...

  11. Browse subject: Acid rain -- Bibliography

    Filed under: Acid rain -- United States -- Bibliography. Acid rain, 1986 : 223 citations (U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library, 1987), by Sheldon Cheney and National Agricultural Library (U.S.) (page images at HathiTrust) Acid precipitation : a bibliography : a compilation of worldwide literature.

  12. Acid Rain: Causes, Effects and Solutions

    Acid rain, or acid deposition, is a broad term that includes any form of precipitation that contains acidic components, such as sulfuric acid or nitric acid. The precipitation is not...

  13. Browse subject: Acid precipitation (Meteorology) -- Bibliography

    Acid rain bibliography (U.S. National Focal Point for UNEP/INFOTERRA, Office of Library Systems and Services, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1982), by Charlene S. Sayers and U.S. National Focal Point for UNEP/INFOTERRA. (page images at HathiTrust) Filed under: Acid precipitation (Meteorology)

  14. Acid rain (Book)

    Acid rain: a bibliography of research annotated for easy access. Book Stopp, Jr, G. During the past 25 years the subject of acid precipitation has leaped into the foreground of public awareness. Although there have been many new technological developments in atmospheric chemistry during this time, probably the area that has been to date most ...

  15. Acid Rain Bibliography

    ----- INTRODUCTION This bibliography was prepared to identify recent publications on various aspects of ACID RAIN. It contains 453 citations covering journal articles, published bibliographies, books, reports, conference and symposium proceedings, and audio visual materials.

  16. Acid rain: an annotated bibliography of selected references

    Book: Acid rain: an annotated bibliography of selected references. Acid rain: an annotated bibliography of selected references. Full Record; Other Related Research; Abstract. A brief annotated bibliography of selected references was prepared. The objective was to inform the general public about the dangers of acid rain. (MDF)

  17. Acid Rain: Overview and Abstracts

    'Acid rain' is a broad term used to describe several ways that acids fall out of the atmosphere. A more precise term is acid deposition, which has two parts: wet and dry. Wet deposition refers to acidic rain, fog, and snow. As this acidic water flows over and through the ground, it affects a variety of plants and animals. The strength of the effects depends on many factors, including how ...

  18. Acid rain (Book)

    The bibliography covers both the scientific and the political aspects of the acid rain question. Authors: Stopp, G H Publication Date: Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1985 Research Org.: Univ. of North Carolina at Greensboro OSTI Identifier: 5235551 Resource Type: Book Country of Publication: United States Language: English Subject:

  19. International bibliography of acid rain, 1977-1986 : Free Download

    International bibliography of acid rain, 1977-1986. Publication date 1987 Topics Acid rain -- Bibliography, Environmental health -- Bibliography Publisher Philadelphia, PA : BIOSIS Collection inlibrary; printdisabled; internetarchivebooks Contributor Internet Archive Language English. 341, 15, 138 p. ; 28 cm Includes indexes

  20. Acid rain bibliography (Technical Report)

    Technical Report: Acid rain bibliography Acid rain bibliography. Full Record; Other Related Research

  21. Annotated Bibliography

    Annotated BibliographyWilson, Jeffery. "Acid Rain in the Twenty-First Century." Journal of Modern Environmental ScienceAccording to Jeffery Wilson, Ph.d in Environmental Sciences, in his article "Acid Rain in the Twenty-First Century" agricultural run-off, industrial dumping, and acid rain are the three main reasons for the decline in the water systems in the world.